Alabama · Nonprofit
RENEW BIRMINGHAM
RENEW BIRMINGHAM (Alabama) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,520,686 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($650,686). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
RENEW BIRMINGHAM is better cushioned than half of the 5,983 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,983 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Housing Affordability Trustshared funderslocalportfolio match
- Holle Family Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- Woodlawn United Inclocalportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
98% of RENEW BIRMINGHAM’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $342k → $519k.
2 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of RENEW BIRMINGHAM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
RENEW BIRMINGHAM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RENEW BIRMINGHAM.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 41% · 2023 55% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
52% of RENEW BIRMINGHAM's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $729k that is directly attributable, 95% of it comes from Alabama funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $792k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 16 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Housing Affordability Trustshared funderslocalportfolio matchTN · backs 33 organizations that share your funders · funds 37 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Holle Family Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchAL · backs 50 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Woodlawn United Inclocalportfolio matchAL · funds 16 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Robert R Meyer Foundationshared funderslocalAL · backs 110 organizations that share your funders · funds 98 organizations near you
- The Arlington Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Featheringill Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cawaco Resource Conservation & Development Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cacajones Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tatajado Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Hugh Kaul Foundationshared funderslocalAL · backs 78 organizations that share your funders · funds 72 organizations near you
- The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundationshared funderslocalAL · backs 94 organizations that share your funders · funds 86 organizations near you
- Campbell Estelle S Char Foundationshared funderslocalPA · backs 53 organizations that share your funders · funds 57 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like RENEW BIRMINGHAM
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Alabama
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
80% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RENEW BIRMINGHAM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds RENEW BIRMINGHAM?
- RENEW BIRMINGHAM (Alabama) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,520,686 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($650,686). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does RENEW BIRMINGHAM have?
- IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $1,520,686 in grants to RENEW BIRMINGHAM, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of RENEW BIRMINGHAM?
- NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $650,686 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like RENEW BIRMINGHAM find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 16funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing