How much did COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA INC grant in FY2022?

Human Services$675kYouth Development$330kHealth$310kCrime & Legal$303kFood & Nutrition$230kCommunity Improvement$189kHousing & Shelter$160kPhilanthropy$135kEducation$105kOther$1.5M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

employmentresearchcommunity-basedsubstance abusepromotingmaintainpatients

2021

workslodgingresponsestrengthensjewishchristianministry

2022

sustainabilityholisticchristianboard education

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k27 grants · $642k
$50k–250k10 grants · $500k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

CRISIS CENTER$50,000
CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
PATHWAYS INC$50,000
WEST JEFFERSON HELPING FAMILIES INTIATIVE$50,000
BLOUNT COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER$50,000
COMMUNITY CARE DEVELOPMENT NETWORK$50,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$50,000
FELLOWSHIP HOUSE$50,000
RAISING ARROWS$50,000
OFFENDER ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$50,000
CASA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY$40,000
SHELBY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE$40,000
FAIRFIELD CITY SCHOOLS$32,500
COOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES$30,576
IMPACT FAMILY COUNSELING INC$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $675k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 13%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.7M · 44 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.7M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%

+39%

Still filing today

80%

83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CC
COMMUNITY CARE DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
3× · 2020–2022 · $114k · revenue +1199%
FB
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ALABASTER FOOD MINISTRY
3× · 2020–2022 · $108k · revenue +153%
OA
OFFENDER ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
2× · 2021–2022 · $100k · revenue +680%

Funded once

UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMAgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +74%
AA
AIDS ALABAMA INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +63%
JV
JONES VALLEY TEACHING FARM
one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal

Alabama Association of Habitat

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—

Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

—

Child Advocacy Center of Cullman

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services

Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin

Christian nonprofit organization dedicated to the elimination of poverty substandard housing in baldwin county, alabama.

—

Food Bank of North Alabama Inc

collect warehouse & distribute food to needy organizations

Food & Nutrition

Central Alabama Regional

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama

Crime & Legal

Nami Alabama Inc

To promote adovcacy and support for the mentally ill.

Health

Rebuilding Together Central Alabama

Bringing volunteers and communities together to improve the homes and lives of low-income homeowners.

Community Improvement

Developing Alabama Youth Foundation Inc

Operate a comprehensive youth treatment center for at risk adolescents (ages 13-18) in Shelby County, Alabama

Health

Wings Across Alabama

To educate, empower, and improve services for mental health consumers in the state of alabama.

Education

Alabama Asset Building Coalition

The Mission of the Alabama Asset Building Coalition is to promote financial stability and self- sufficiency for low wealth individuals and families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabama Possible and the most unlike its peers is Hudson-Alpha Institute for. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/110

the rest of the field

13%

667/5,264

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

93 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

88/93

Grantees still filing

73/93

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,946,182Human Services$674,862Youth Development$329,887Health$309,726Crime & Legal$303,050Food & Nutrition$229,500Community Improvement$188,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of GreaterAL131.7× affinity72 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater · United Way of Central Alabama Inc · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Walker Area Community Foundation Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · Community Food Bank of Central Alabama · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Junior League of Birmingham Inc · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NEW LIFE SDA CHURCH PANTRY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 582085326 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NEW LIFE SDA CHURCH PANTRY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 26% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Partnership of Alabama Inc?

Find your warmest path to Community Partnership of Alabama Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

93 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Partnership of Alabama Inc?

More from the funding graph

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

93 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Partnership of Alabama Inc?

More from the funding graph