· Private foundation
Skelton Myra F Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION | $63,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +116%
- WRWyoming Rescue Mission4× · 2018–2023 · $28k · revenue +27%
- SOSpecial Olympics Wyoming Inc3× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- MMMIDWEST-EDGERTON MEDICAL SERVICESone grant, 2020 · $12k
- CCCASPER COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -32%
- MAMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF WYOMINGone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To serve victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other crimes committted in big horn county, wyoming
WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…
To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.
We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.
To raise funds on behalf of the wyoming county community hospital.
The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.
To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make a Wish Foundation of Wyoming and the most unlike its peers is The Science Zone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Camp Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics Wyoming Inc ↗
- Who funds WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS ↗
- Who funds MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CASPER COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF WYOMING ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Dementia Care ↗
- Who funds CASA of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds MIMIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE SCIENCE ZONE ↗
- Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Natrona County Public Library Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds CASPER HOUSING AUTHORITY CARES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · Zimmerman Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Wold Foundation · Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute · United Way of Natrona County · Double 4 Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · Blue Envelope Health Fund · Wheeler Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Skelton Myra F Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.