· Public charity
Blue Envelope Health Fund
Financial medical assistance
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $133,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $164,109 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,859 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION | $24,000 |
| CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICE | $15,000 |
| YOUTH CRISIS CENTER | $15,000 |
| MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| NATRONA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT | $11,000 |
| UNACCOMPANIED STUDENT INITIATIVE | $10,000 |
| CAMP HOPE | $10,000 |
| WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FAMILY PRACTICE | $9,250 |
| IRIS CLUBHOUSE | $8,000 |
| JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUST6× · 2017–2022 · $114k · revenue +691% · 46% of their budget
- OCOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC5× · 2019–2024 · $112k · revenue +82%
- CWCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS5× · 2017–2023 · $102k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- BNBAR NUNN FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2021 · $33k
- NCNATRONA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2019 · $33k
- COCity of Casper Wyomingone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.
None
To raise funds on behalf of the wyoming county community hospital.
To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.
The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.
The Wyoming County Community Health Foundation identifies, selects, and invests in programs and Organizations that will improve the health and wellness of people in Wyoming County and surrounding communities.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…
The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.
We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc and the most unlike its peers is Natrona Collective Health Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Iris House Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Dementia Care ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASPER ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING HEALTH FAIRS ↗
- Who funds CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SKI PATROL SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds Arc of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF CENTRAL WYOMING INC ↗
- Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Foundation ↗
- Who funds Natrona County Public Library Foundation ↗
- Who funds Self Help Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Interfaith of Natrona County Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · Zimmerman Family Foundation · United Way of Natrona County · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Double 4 Foundation · Wold Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Skelton Myra F Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · Masterson Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Blue Envelope Health Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.