How much did BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND grant in FY2024?

BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND reported 11 grants totaling $164,109 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND based?

BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND is based in WY.

BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND

Financial medical assistance

$164k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$24k

Largest

01What you fund

0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$493kHousing & Shelter$101kHuman Services$94kCommunity Improvement$42kEducation$19kArts & Culture$10kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$445k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

victimssheltercounselingloved oneseducation

2019

zoll monitor

2020

aed'sartloved onesnatrona

2021

fireseniorequipment

2022

loved oneseducationequipment

2023

citizensseniorequipmentnatrona

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $23k
$10k–50k8 grants · $110k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION$24,000
CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICE$15,000
MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC$15,000
YOUTH CRISIS CENTER$15,000
NATRONA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$11,000
CAMP HOPE$10,000
UNACCOMPANIED STUDENT INITIATIVE$10,000
WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FAMILY PRACTICE$9,250
IRIS CLUBHOUSE$8,000
JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$978k · 18 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$978k

$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%

-9%

Still filing today

83%

47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WM
WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
6× · 2017–2022 · $114k · revenue +240% · 46% of their budget
OC
OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION
5× · 2019–2024 · $112k · revenue +493%
CW
CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE PROGRAM
5× · 2017–2023 · $102k · revenue +137%

Funded once

BN
BAR NUNN FIRE DEPARTMENT
one grant, 2021 · $33k
NC
NATRONA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
one grant, 2019 · $33k
CO
CITY OF CASPER
one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Carbon County Counseling Center

Provide professional counseling services to the residents of Carbon County, WY

—

Wyoming Cares Inc

To provide assistance to wyoming residents in need.

Human Services

Wyoming Medical Center Inc

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated and coordinated care and population health management.

Health

Wyoming Community Hospital Foundation

To raise funds on behalf of the wyoming county community hospital.

—

Wyoming Health Resources Network Inc

Referral of medical professionals

Health

Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations

The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.

Philanthropy

Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii

Health

Wyoming County Community Health Fou

The Wyoming County Community Health Foundation identifies, selects, and invests in programs and Organizations that will improve the health and wellness of people in Wyoming County and surrounding communities.

Health

Natrona County Meals on Wheels Inc

To prepare and deliver meals to the elderly and/or homebound in Natrona County.

Human Services

Caring Foundation of Wyoming

Human Services

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Serve Wyoming Inc

The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Center of Central and the most unlike its peers is Natrona Collective Health Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

11%

50/471

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/24

Grantees still filing

13/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$493,247Other$444,535Housing & Shelter$101,000Human Services$93,858Community Improvement$42,000Education$19,445Arts & Culture$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY38.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · United Way of Natrona County · Double 4 Foundation · Zimmerman Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Wold Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Masterson Family Foundation · Wheeler Family Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WYOMING DEMENTIA CARE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 800196873 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WYOMING DEMENTIA CARE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Blue Envelope Health Fund?

Find your warmest path to Blue Envelope Health Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Blue Envelope Health Fund?

More from the funding graph

BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Blue Envelope Health Fund?

More from the funding graph