· Private foundation
Double 4 Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k43 grants · $161k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION | $589,100 |
| WYO COMPLEX | $500,000 |
| LIBERTAS INSTITUTE | $85,240 |
| DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| WYOMING AGRICULTURE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $50,000 |
| COMMUNIO INTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC REVIEW | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION | $16,666 |
| ST ANTHONY TRI-PARISH CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $13,197 |
| AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST | $10,000 |
| OUR LADY OF FATIMA CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH | $10,000 |
| WESTON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES CENTER | $10,000 |
| TROOPERS DRUM & BUGLE CORPS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
- WSWYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST2× · 2022–2025 · $120k · revenue +34%
- SCSigma Chi Foundation5× · 2021–2025 · $78k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- DSDiamond Sage Grouse Foundation Incone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -99% · 25% of their budget
- WSWESTERN STATE SAGE GROUSE RECOVERYone grant, 2021 · $50k
- II-REACHone grant, 2021 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.
To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.
The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.
The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.
To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.
Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…
The mission of recover wyoming is to advocate for persons in recovery and mobilize resources to aid them, their families and allies, to increase the occurence and quality of long-term recovery from addiction. through recovery promotion and…
WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…
To provide for continually increasing opportunities for individuals with disabilities to live as independently as possible. To do so for all within the State of Wyoming through judicious and aggressive management of resources.
The wyoming donor alliance supports a network of statewide organizations focused on increasing civic participation.
To ensure that the Wyoming State Fair serves as a vibrant celebration of our states agriculture, youth, education, heritage, and industry, while evolving to meet the needs of future generations. WSFF is the fundraising arm of the WSF,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph's Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Troopers Foundation Inc Attn James R Montgomery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 44% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WYO COMPLEX ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Casper Family YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST ↗
- Who funds Libertas Network ↗
- Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
- Who funds DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Diamond Sage Grouse Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Americans for Prosperity Foundation ↗
- Who funds WYOMING AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Foundation ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CASA of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds TROOPERS DRUM & BUGLE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTING WITH HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS ↗
- Who funds Interfaith of Natrona County Inc ↗
- Who funds 12-24 CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds WESTON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
- Who funds Child Development Center of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Natrona County Public Library Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · Wold Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of Natrona County · Zimmerman Family Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Verdad Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · Tw Foundation · Tate Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Double 4 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Double 4 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Double 4 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.