· Public charity
National Health Care for Homeless Council
Grounded in human rights and social justice, the nhchc mission is to build an equitable, high-quality health care system through training, research, and advocacy in the movement to end homelessness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $929,550 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $970,524 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,974 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $832k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAYWOOD STREET CONGREGATION | $182,804 |
| BOB TAVANI HOUSE FOR MEDICAL RESPITE | $181,318 |
| HENNEPIN COUNTY | $177,966 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $130,385 |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON | $100,000 |
| HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CA | $60,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY | $34,777 |
| HORIZON RECUPERATIVE CARE | $25,000 |
| HARBOR CARE FOUNDATION | $12,100 |
| RIS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| GOLDEN STATE RECUPERATIVE CARE INC | $10,000 |
| COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $5,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JWCH INSTITUTE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $459k · revenue +85%- AHAffinia Healthcare3× · 2022–2024 · $350k · revenue +3%
- TWThe Wright Center Medical Group3× · 2022–2024 · $342k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANEone grant, 2023 · $245k · revenue -10%
- JJUSTDANEone grant, 2023 · $132k · revenue 0%
- HHHOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $115k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.
Providing services to the homeless, low income individuals, and hiv/aids infected and affected individuals
Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.
The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
Provide quality, holistic medical care to people experiencing homelessness who need a safe place to heal, while assisting them in breaking the cycle of homelessness.
We provide safe, affordable recovery housing for adults in addiction treatment and recovery.
Peninsula healthcare connection (phc), a palo alto based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, was founded in 2005 as a collaborative venture between the community working group, palo alto medical foundation, and stanford university school of…
Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…
The mission of Central City Concern (CCC) is to provide comprehensive solutions for ending homelessness and achieving self-sufficiency. Founded in 1979, CCC has developed a comprehensive continuum of affordable housing options integrated…
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 5CITIES Homeless Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Next Step Initiative Tennessee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOB TAVANI HOUSE FOR MEDICAL RESPITE ↗
- Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Affinia Healthcare ↗
- Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
- Who funds OPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
- Who funds LIFESPRING INC ↗
- Who funds CAMILLUS HEALTH CONCERN INC ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CRESCENTCARE HOLDINGS INC ↗
- Who funds UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTDANE ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds KA HALE A KE OLA HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds MERCY CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Forward SF Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSING MATTERS ↗
- Who funds WELLSPACE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PathForward Inc ↗
- Who funds Colorado Coalition for the Homeless ↗
- Who funds CHATT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING INN ↗
- Who funds HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ASCENDING TO HEALTH RESPITE CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Dignity Health · Americares Foundation Inc · Give Back Foundation · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · American Cancer Society Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Boulevard Bolt Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Health Care for Homeless Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Camillus Health Concern Inc — 70% of income from government
- Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Optimus Health Care Inc — 22% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of Central Florida Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.