Skip to content
National Children's Alliance Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Children's Alliance Inc

To support the development, growth and continuance of facilities where child victims of sexual and/or physical abuse can go for intervention and counseling.

$24M
Granted FY2025still arriving
458
Grants FY2025still arriving
52
States reached
$580k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$77MHuman Services$20MHealth$6.7MYouth Development$750kArts & Culture$465kCivil Rights$318kEmployment$243kCommunity Improvement$199kOther$0
02FY2025 · 458 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k49 grants · $360k
  • $10k–50k305 grants · $8.1M
  • $50k–250k85 grants · $9.6M
  • $250k+19 grants · $6.3M
$25,497
Median grant
52
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA$579,951
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ILLINOIS$430,487
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TX INC$388,923
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TENNESSEE$377,214
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF GEORGIA$350,367
PA CHAPTER CACS & MDTS$339,459
CALICO CENTER (CHILD ABUSE LISTENING$338,480
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF MICHIGAN$334,521
FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S$332,286
NEW YORK STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC$320,927
THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$316,933
WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK$288,868
COLORADO CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$287,321
CACS OF WASHINGTON$274,989
CACS OF OKLAHOMA INC$274,732
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $29.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $211k → 16%IDAHO NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S: $165k → 8%HAWAII STATE CHAPTER OF CHILDREN'S JUST: $174k → 9%CACS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $180k → 14%CACS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $275k → 15%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ARKANSAS: $257k → 17%FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC: $190k → 19%MISSOURI KIDSFIRST: $273k → 10%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TENNESSEE: $286k → 14%INDIANA CHAPTER OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $181k → 13%INDIANA CHAPTER OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $217k → 15%WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK: $258k → 18%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $239k → 8%RESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS & CHILDREN - STEVIE'S PLACE: $255k → 21%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF VIRGINIA: $164k → 8%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $315k → 42%MASSACHUSETTS CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $172k → 16%CHILDHAVEN INC: $180k → 22%CACS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $162k → 14%CACS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $251k → 15%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ARKANSAS: $165k → 17%MISSOURI KIDSFIRST: $198k → 10%TENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CACS: $270k → 14%WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK: $192k → 18%RESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS & CHILDREN - STEVIE'S PLACE: $192k → 21%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF VIRGINIA: $159k → 8%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $175k → 42%LOUISIANA ALLIANCE OF CACS: $198k → 11%CHILDHAVEN INC: $168k → 22%MISSOURI KIDSFIRST: $177k → 10%TENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CACS: $234k → 14%WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK: $160k → 18%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $157k → 42%NEW MEXICO CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $164k → 22%MISSOURI KIDSFIRST: $166k → 10%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TENNESSEE: $215k → 14%MISSOURI KIDSFIRST: $162k → 10%TENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CACS: $205k → 14%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF VIRGINIA: $262k → 20%FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S: $332k → 19%MISSOURI KIDSFIRST: $158k → 10%TENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CAC'S: $171k → 14%FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC: $233k → 19%FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S: $198k → 19%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TENNESSEE: $377k → 14%WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK: $289k → 18%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TENNESSEE: $224k → 14%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TENNESSEE: $223k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127M · 361 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

361 repeat relationships: 272 still active in FY2025, 89 since wound down; 66 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

361
91

Total granted

$127M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+6%

Still filing today

90%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue ×20 · 59% of their budget
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +110%
  • NY
    New York State Childrens' Alliance Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +78% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • LA
    LOUISIANA ALLIANCE OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $177k
  • GH
    Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $73k · revenue +12%
  • TS
    The Safe Center LI Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $59k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services
2
Children's Advocacy Center of Comal Coun

To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
3
Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal
4
Delta Childrens Advocacy Center

Delta Childrens Advocacy Centers mission is to respond to child abuse in the Mississippi Delta by serving and nurturing children and non-offending caregivers through a trauma-informed multidisciplinary approach.

Crime & Legal
5
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
6
Morgan County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a safe caring place to evaluate any child who may have been abused

Crime & Legal
7
Safe Spot Child Advocacy Center of Wilkes

To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…

Youth Development
8
Childrens Advocacy Center of Smith County

The children's advocacy center of smith county's mission is to protect and restore the lives of abused children through team investigations, healing services, community outreach and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
9
Macomb County Child Advocacy Center Inc

The mission of macomb county child advocacy center, inc. is to prevent and reduce the incidence and trauma of child sexual and physical abuse in macomb county through collaborative,

Crime & Legal
10
Child and Youth Advocacy Center

To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…

Human Services
11
The Childrens Advocacy Center of Cleveland County

To coordinate a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach to child abuse cases. To provide private forensic interviews and medical exams in a child-friendly environment.

Crime & Legal
12
Children's Advocacy Center of the Coastal Bend

Nueces county childrens advocacy center is organized to provide a safe environment for sexual and physical child abuse investigations. there is a comprehensive program in order to make investigations and interviews less traumatic.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Benton County; the most unlike its peers is Pinnacle Health Medical Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

464 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 464 of the 521 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

38
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
131
Early backer (in before they grew)
458/464
Grantees still filing
320/464
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ILLINOIS: $3,372,479 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ILLINOISCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC: $3,281,199 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INCNew York State Childrens' Alliance Inc: $3,017,274 · Crime & LegalNew York State Childrens' Alliance IncCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,767,333 · Crime & LegalThe Childrens Advocacy Centers of Michigan: $2,685,284 · Crime & LegalChildren's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Inc: $2,454,816 · Crime & LegalCALICO CENTER: $2,207,262 · Crime & Legal+73 more: $35,369,962 · Crime & Legal+73 moreTENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY: $2,713,805 · Human ServicesTENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CHILDREN'…FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC: $2,019,036 · Human ServicesFLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S …WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ABUSE NETWORK INC: $2,013,075 · Human ServicesWEST VIRGINIA CHILD ABUSE NETW…MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD ABUSE: $1,993,939 · Human ServicesMISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD…CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,951,391 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF…Childrens Advocacy Center of Virginia: $1,638,022 · Human ServicesMassachusetts Children'S Alliance Inc: $1,587,705 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ARKANSAS: $1,472,910 · Human ServicesCHILDHAVEN INC: $1,420,471 · Human ServicesINDIANA CHAPTER OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $1,267,367 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERS OF MISSISSIPPI: $1,246,637 · Human ServicesLOUISIANA ALLIANCE OF CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERS: $1,198,872 · Human Services+34 more: $11,099,079 · Human Services+34 moreSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $1,382,830 · OtherSTATE OF UTA…DAY ONE: $992,035 · OtherDAY ONESANFORD: $884,026 · OtherSANFORDMAINE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT: $832,279 · OtherMAINE COALIT…BRIGHT TOMORROWS: $651,035 · OtherPEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT: $520,836 · OtherSafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc: $517,640 · OtherDEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $469,783 · Other+30 more: $6,413,663 · Other+30 moreCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,209,502 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF WASHINGTON: $1,832,202 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC: $1,785,277 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS: $1,605,349 · Youth DevelopmentCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $1,268,576 · Youth Development+3 more: $534,570 · Youth DevelopmentChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $947,699 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $418,976 · HealthSPACE COAST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $393,952 · HealthPALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $373,463 · HealthSUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $362,691 · HealthFamily and Youth Counseling Agency Inc: $294,409 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON: $286,695 · HealthSOUTHERN TIER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC: $280,300 · HealthLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $274,696 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $224,218 · HealthThe Carousel Center Inc: $221,392 · HealthIOWA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $219,440 · HealthOrlando Health Inc: $212,149 · Health+10 more: $1,629,510 · HealthOHIO NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS: $2,325,910 · Civil RightsSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $186,270 · Civil RightsCHILDRENS ADVOCACY PROGRAMS OF THE BLUE RIDGE INC: $136,646 · Civil RightsADVOCACY NETWORK FOR CHILDREN: $135,053 · Civil RightsDENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $476,447 · Employment
Crime & Legal$55,155,609Human Services$31,622,309Other$12,664,127Youth Development$9,235,476Health$6,139,590Civil Rights$2,783,879Employment$476,447

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ILLINOIS: $3,372,479 over 9y, 59% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC: $3,281,199 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetNew York State Childrens' Alliance Inc: $3,017,274 over 9y, 55% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,767,333 over 9y, 29% of budgetTENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY: $2,713,805 over 9y, 49% of budgetThe Childrens Advocacy Centers of Michigan: $2,685,284 over 9y, 53% of budgetChildren's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Inc: $2,454,816 over 9y, 16% of budgetOHIO NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS: $2,325,910 over 9y, 68% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,209,502 over 9y, 68% of budgetCALICO CENTER: $2,207,262 over 9y, 45% of budgetFLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC: $2,019,036 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CHILD ABUSE NETWORK INC: $2,013,075 over 9y, 38% of budgetMISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD ABUSE: $1,993,939 over 9y, 34% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,951,391 over 9y, 89% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF WASHINGTON: $1,832,202 over 9y, 16% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC: $1,785,277 over 9y, 82% of budgetCOLORADO CHILD ADVOCACY ALLIANCE: $1,765,711 over 9y, 72% of budgetChildrens Advocacy Center of Virginia: $1,638,022 over 9y, 49% of budgetMARYLAND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $1,632,626 over 9y, 78% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS: $1,605,349 over 9y, 91% of budgetMassachusetts Children'S Alliance Inc: $1,587,705 over 9y, 23% of budgetALABAMA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC: $1,480,260 over 9y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ARKANSAS: $1,472,910 over 9y, 31% of budgetCHILDHAVEN INC: $1,420,471 over 9y, 10.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $1,394,902 over 9y, 22% of budgetTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $1,360,644 over 9y, 10% of budgetOREGON CHILD ABUSE SOLUTIONS: $1,346,752 over 9y, 43% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $1,311,607 over 8y, 35% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $1,268,576 over 9y, 97% of budgetINDIANA CHAPTER OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $1,267,367 over 9y, 89% of budgetCHILDRENS ALLIANCE OF MONTANA: $1,257,901 over 9y, 58% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERS OF MISSISSIPPI: $1,246,637 over 9y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KENTUCKY INC: $1,243,131 over 9y, 60% of budgetThe Vermont Children's Alliance: $1,213,351 over 9y, 79% of budgetMinnesota Chapter of the National Childrens Alliance: $1,204,536 over 9y, 35% of budgetLOUISIANA ALLIANCE OF CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERS: $1,198,872 over 8y, 34% of budgetNEBRASKA ALLIANCE OF CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERS: $1,132,551 over 9y, 22% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $1,079,813 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetAlaska Childrens Alliance: $1,025,853 over 9y, 69% of budgetIowa Chapter of Children's Advocacy Centers: $995,051 over 9y, 77% of budgetDAY ONE: $992,035 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetHAWAII STATE CHAPTER OF CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTERS: $966,813 over 9y, 100% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $947,699 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arizona Child and Family Advocacy Network: $913,726 over 9y, 89% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF NORTH DAKOTA: $899,835 over 9y, 62% of budgetMAINE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT: $832,279 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF DELAWARE: $790,851 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetPartners with Families and Children Spokane: $785,745 over 8y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds New York State Childrens' Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE CHAPTER OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Advocacy Centers of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds CALICO CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA CHILD ABUSE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CHILD ADVOCACY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Advocacy Center of Virginia ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Children'S Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds OREGON CHILD ABUSE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA CHAPTER OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ALLIANCE OF MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERS OF MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Vermont Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Chapter of the National Childrens Alliance ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA ALLIANCE OF CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA ALLIANCE OF CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Childrens Alliance ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Sexually Abused Child…Children's Advocacy C…Missouri Network Agai…Ohio Network of Child…Knot Today IncChildren's Advocacy C…Rite Aid Healthy Futu…Children's Advocacy C…Tennessee Chapter of …In-N-Out Burgers Foun…Children's Advocacy C…Colorado Child Advoca…
Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)KS46× affinity20 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred) · Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc · Missouri Network Against Child Abuse · Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers · Knot Today Inc · Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Inc · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Children's Advocacy Centers of Pennsylvania · Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Children's Advocacy Centers of North Carolina Inc · Colorado Child Advocacy Alliance

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Children's Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Children's Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • New Jersey Children's Alliance Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Alliance Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Children'S Alliance Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Kristi House Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Friends of the Child Advocacy Center Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Oregon Child Abuse Solutions: 30% of income from government
  • Santa Rosa Kids' House Inc: 21% of income from government
  • The Vermont Children's Alliance: 20% of income from government
  • Maryland Children's Alliance Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Children's Advocacy Center of Delaware: 10% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Space Coast Health Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Center for Hope Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Childrens Center: 0% of income from government
  • Orlando Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
129report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 521 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Children's Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home