Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)

Sacred provides immediate financial support to families in need due to child sexual abuse.

$232k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Crime & Legal$302kHuman Services$122kHealth$116kYouth Development$38kRecreation & Sports$18kCivil Rights$3kOther$108k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $204,888 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $231,812 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,924 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $161k
$12,209
Median grant
6
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KVC BEVAVIORAL HEALTHCARE MISSOURI INC$26,575
CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC$23,279
CENTER FOR HOPE$19,204
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF DOUGLAS COUNTY$18,554
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$17,268
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER IN$16,882
CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON AND CHEROKEE CO$15,133
LIFEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCAY CENTER INC$12,209
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$12,078
HOPE UNLIMITED$8,685
SUNFLOWER HOUSE$8,607
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY$8,089
A CHILD'S VOICE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$7,414
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC$5,526
THE TREEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MD INC$5,385
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VERITY REDWOOD CHILDREN'S CENTER: $13k → 7%SUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $9k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON AND CHEROKEE CO: $15k → 17%CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER COUNTY: $9k → 10%HOPE UNLIMITED: $9k → 16%KID'S HARBOR INC: $11k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $1k → 9%A CHILD'S VOICE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $7k → 11%VERITY REDWOOD CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 7%CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON AND CHEROKEE CO: $11k → 17%KID'S HARBOR INC: $8k → 13%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $9k → 17%HOPE CENTER INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
CT
CA
MO
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$520k · 16 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$520k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $131k · revenue +76%
  • LH
    LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $66k · revenue +21%
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO
    4× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +14%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue -23%
  • SC
    SUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services
2
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
3
Childrens Advocacy Center of Smith County

The children's advocacy center of smith county's mission is to protect and restore the lives of abused children through team investigations, healing services, community outreach and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
4
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
5
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
6
Children's Advocacy Center of Comal Coun

To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
8
Childrens Advocacy Center for Child Abuse Assessment and Treatment

We provide children affected by violence and their families with services of support, forensic interviews, resources, and hope.

Crime & Legal
9
Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal
10
Children's Advocacy Center of Ottawa Countyinc

Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.

Crime & Legal
11
Safe Spot Child Advocacy Center of Wilkes

To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…

Youth Development
12
Morgan County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a safe caring place to evaluate any child who may have been abused

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Advocacy Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sutter County Community Action Agency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
30/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC — $131,275 · Crime & LegalCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INCSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC — $48,426 · Crime & LegalSUNFLOWER HOUSE INCTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC — $31,757 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI …THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $22,125 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INCChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District — $12,582 · Crime & LegalTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $12,078 · Crime & Legal+8 more — $43,411 · Crime & Legal+8 moreCRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO — $44,797 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER OF AN…REDWOOD CITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMINC — $21,724 · Human ServicesREDWOOD CITY CHILD …KIDS HARBOR INC — $18,740 · Human ServicesKIDS HARBOR INCCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO — $9,271 · Human ServicesCHILD ADVOCACY CENT…HOPE UNLIMITED INC — $8,685 · Human ServicesHOPE UNLIMITED INCSUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $8,551 · Human ServicesSUTTER COUNTY COMMU…A Childs Voice Child Advocacy Center In — $7,414 · Human ServicesA Childs Voice Chil…+2 more — $2,471 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC — $65,625 · HealthLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH …ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $17,268 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN'…THE STEPPING STONE CHILD ADVOCACY — $15,211 · HealthTHE STEPPING STONE…The Tree House Child Advocacy Center of Montgomery County MD Inc — $14,228 · HealthThe Tree House Chi…+2 more — $4,103 · HealthKVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE MISSOURI INC — $26,575 · OtherKVC BEHAVIORAL HE…Children's Advocacy Center of Douglas County Inc — $18,554 · OtherChildren's Advoca…COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF CECIL COUNTY INC — $16,527 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICE…CHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC — $13,835 · OtherCHILD ADVOCACY AN…SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $13,521 · OtherSUNLIGHT CHILDREN…WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $8,396 · OtherWOMEN'S CENTER IN…SOS Inc — $8,170 · OtherSOS Inc+1 more — $2,208 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC — $37,648 · Youth DevelopmentLIFEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERINC — $17,824 · Recreation & SportsSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC — $3,244 · Civil Rights
Crime & Legal$301,654Human Services$121,653Health$116,435Other$107,786Youth Development$37,648Recreation & Sports$17,824Civil Rights$3,244

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC — $131,275 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC — $65,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC — $48,426 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO — $44,797 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF KANSAS INC — $37,648 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC — $31,757 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE MISSOURI INC — $26,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $22,125 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetREDWOOD CITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMINC — $21,724 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKIDS HARBOR INC — $18,740 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Advocacy Center of Douglas County Inc — $18,554 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetLIFEHOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERINC — $17,824 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $17,268 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEPPING STONE CHILD ADVOCACY — $15,211 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Tree House Child Advocacy Center of Montgomery County MD Inc — $14,228 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC — $13,835 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $13,521 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District — $12,582 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $12,078 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO — $9,271 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE UNLIMITED INC — $8,685 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $8,551 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC — $8,396 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOS Inc — $8,170 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY — $8,089 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarion County Children's Avocacy Center Inc — $7,653 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetA Childs Voice Child Advocacy Center In — $7,414 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARYLAND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC — $6,687 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY CH — $6,421 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTONE COUNTY ASSISTANCE TEAM — $6,408 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the Finger Lakes — $5,024 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC — $3,244 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSaint Lukes Health System Inc — $2,772 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $2,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT — $1,568 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD SAFE OF CENTRAL MISSOURI INC — $1,561 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC — $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPats Place Child Advocacy Center — $1,331 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $1,021 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Children's A…Missouri Network Agai…Missouri Children's T…The Sunderland Founda…Commerce Bancshares F…The Morgan Family Fou…Oppenstein Brothers F…Jackson County Commun…Health Forward Founda…United Way of Greater…Greater Kansas City C…Bnsf Railway Foundati…
National Children's Alliance IncDC46× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Children's Alliance Inc · Missouri Network Against Child Abuse · Missouri Children's Trust Fund · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Morgan Family Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Maryland Children's Alliance Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)?

Find your warmest path to Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines