· Public charity
Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc
Children's advocacy centers of texas, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $5,437,687 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC | $5,198,929 |
| THE CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER FOUNDATION | $4,993,530 |
| CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION | $3,261,736 |
| ALAMO CAC DBA CHILDSAFE | $3,236,028 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC | $2,617,181 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC | $2,577,278 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC | $2,575,999 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HIDALGO AND STARR COUNTIES | $2,181,597 |
| FT BEND COUNTY CHILD ADVOCATES INC | $1,685,923 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY INC | $1,616,902 |
| WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC | $1,336,484 |
| GARTH HOUSE MICKEY MEHAFFY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY PROGRAM INC | $1,270,292 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND | $1,211,438 |
| PALUXY RIVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC | $1,197,850 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $111.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
74 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $35M · revenue +24% · 37% of their budget
- AFALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $32M · revenue +96% · 66% of their budget
- CAChildren's Assessment Center Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $31M · revenue +52% · 68% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…
To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
Child Advocacy Services
Interview facility for child abuse victims.
Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.
The Carroll County Child Advocacy Center exists to champion the needs of sexually, physically, and emotionally abused children in Carroll, Haralson and Heard counties through prevention, intervention and collaboration.
To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…
Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…
The Child Advocacy Center serves as a facility where children who are victims of physical abuse and their non-offending members can go for evaluation, intervention, evidence gathering and counseling.
Advocacy and care of physically and sexually abused children in lasalle county. we work with the court system in determining the best placement for children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Advocacy Center for Kaufman County and the most unlike its peers is Abigails Arms Cooke County Family Crisis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Assessment Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF HIDALGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc ↗
- Who funds PALUXY RIVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND ↗
- Who funds Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds BRAZORIA COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF BASTROP COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCACY CENTER FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds RUSK COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web ↗
- Who funds MATAGORDA COUNTY WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE CHILDREN OF EL PASO ↗
- Who funds CAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGEHAVEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HENDERSON COUNTY HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE SOUTH PLAINS ↗
- Who funds HARMONY HOME CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Bar Foundation · National Children's Alliance Inc · Texas Center for Child and Family Studies · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Inc · Texas Casa Inc · East Texas Communities Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.