· Public charity
Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Inc
To promote, assist and support the development, growth & continuation of children's advocacy centers in the state of Georgia.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k39 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $195k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAC Thomson - Child Enrichment Inc | $66,750 |
| GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY | $66,750 |
| CARE COTTAGE MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE | $61,375 |
| TWIN CEDARS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC | $44,500 |
| SAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| SOUTH ENOTAH ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| CARROLL COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| SATILLA ADVOCACY SERVICES | $33,375 |
| THE TREEHOUSE CAC OF THOMAS COUNTY | $33,375 |
| SUNSHINE HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| THE COTTAGE SEXUAL ASSAULT & CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| GORDON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| MOSAIC GEORGIA | $33,375 |
| THE BUTTERFLY HOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $33,375 |
| CAC LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT | $33,375 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECHILD ENRICHMENT INC8× · 2017–2024 · $583k · revenue +187%
- SCSouthern Crescent Sexual Assault Center6× · 2017–2022 · $377k · revenue +53%
- CACHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LOWNDES CO INC8× · 2017–2024 · $358k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- CACHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +110%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
Interview facility for child abuse victims.
Child Advocacy Services
Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…
To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…
Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.
To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…
Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.
To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cherokee Child Advocacy Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Okefenokee Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CEDARS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Crescent Sexual Assault Center ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LOWNDES CO INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE - NW GEORGIA CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds A Childs Voice Child Advocacy Center In ↗
- Who funds OKEFENOKEE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE COTTAGE SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER & CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds EMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR ↗
- Who funds THE LILY PAD SANE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH INC ↗
- Who funds MARY LOU FRASER FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Appalachian Childrens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COASTAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF CC INC ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN I ↗
- Who funds SafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CARROLL COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE GATEWAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Rainbow House Childrens Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Lighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center ↗
- Who funds THE TREE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HERO HOUSE THE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Forsyth County Child Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF THOMAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Harmony House Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PATAULA CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Prevent Child Abuse Gordon County Inc ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT IN ABUSIVE FAMILY EMERGENCIES INC ↗
- Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL CENTER OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · National Children's Alliance Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Pittulloch Foundation Inc · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Hedge Funds Care Inc · Robins Financial Credit Union · Jesse Parker Williams Foundation Inc · Walton Electric Trust Inc · J Bulow Campbell Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.