Nebraska · Nonprofit
PROJECT HARMONY
PROJECT HARMONY (Nebraska) receives grants from 96 organizations whose IRS filings report $53,754,066 to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($19,793,401). 64 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $15M
- Funders on record
- 96
- Grants received
- $54M
- Net assets
- $59M
What Project Harmony does
Mission
To protect and support children, collaborate with professionals and engage the community to end child abuse and neglect.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Mental health: mental health has been an expanding service for the agency. This treatment is specific to the needs of children who have experienced trauma because of abuse or neglect. The program uses a variety of evidenced-based treatment models to include trauma focused cognitive behavioral therapy, parent-child interactive treatment, and many others. The program delivers treatment in individual sessions with children and conducts family therapy and group models. In 2025 the program provided counseling services to 677 clients of which 452 were youth up to the age of 24.
$2,204,718 spent$334,510 earned by the program18% of program spendingConnections: we believe that children with behavioral health symptoms, which are often indicative of toxic stress, trauma, and exposure to violence, can be identified before an incident of child maltreatment occurs, and if timely, appropriate, and effective services can be offered, a child can get back on track developmentally, function better at home and in the classroom, and be safer at home and in the community. Our mental health coordinators work with over 145 schools in the metro omaha area to identify children and families in need and then guide them through a network of mental health and social service providers. In 2025 there were 1,689 referrals: 66% from omaha public schools, 12% from millard public schools, 8% from papillion la vista public schools, 9% from bellevue public schools 3% from ralston public schools, and 2% from other referral sources. All of these children were assigned a mental health coordinator who helped them navigate mental health and community services. Of those referrals 6,068 counseling sessions were provided.
$2,140,229 spent18% of program spendingMissing and anti-trafficking youth services: the missing and anti-trafficking youth services efforts are targeting children in the community who are reported as missing or run-away from their caregiver's home. As a part of this response, the agency coordinates with local law enforcement to identify children who have repeatedly run from home to intervene early to prevent escalating behaviors or victimization. For youth known to be high risk children who may be involved in minor sex trafficking, or children who have been exposed to commercially explicit sexual material online, a youth specialist provides more intensive support to the youth. Advocacy, medical support (for the child) and mental health services are provided to the child and their protective caregivers. The program takes a multidisciplinary approach involving law enforcement, the judicial system, mental health care, medical care, and advocacy to ensure children are safe and protected. Homeland security and the us attorney's office are local partners as well, to ensure victims who may have been abused across state lines or in an online format are protected. In 2025, 1638 youth and caregivers received services through our…
$1,744,682 spentof which $20,000 as grants15% of program spendingOther program services include:referral and advocacy: the purpose of the advocacy and referral program is to ensure the family has the necessary support and resources to deal with the recent abuse of their child. Each family is assigned a referral specialist who provides a plan for services after the investigation. The plan may include counseling referrals, legal referrals, or education. In addition, the organization provides case coordination for the child abuse investigation team. This service allows the organization to ensure that communication is shared across disciplines, and the focus of the coordination is to improve the process of investigations. In 2025, Project Harmony continued to implement a new case management system and was better able to capture all advocacy sessions the organization provided, to include community outreach, anti-trafficking, and missing youth advocacy. In 2025, family advocates provided 14,158 advocacy sessions and contacts for youth and protective caregivers.
$1,549,019 spent13% of program spendingMedical evaluations: the organization's medical and nursing staff specialize in evaluating children who are suspected to have been abused or neglected. Their role is to provide physical, sexual, and neglect evaluations/assessments as well as comprehensive exams for children placed in foster care. In addition, the clinical staff provide expert medical opinions regarding child maltreatment. In 2025, the organization provided 1,616 medical exams.
$1,325,699 spent$531,462 earned by the program11% of program spendingForensic interviews: when requested by law enforcement of child protective services, Project Harmony provides forensic interviews to assist in the assessment of a child disclosing abuse or neglect. These interviews are video recorded and coordinated with investigative agencies. One of the objectives of this integrated process is to minimize the number of interviews a child is subjected to during an investigation. In addition, the program has designed the process to be child focused and family centered. In 2025, the program provided 1691 interviews to children.
$1,114,824 spent9% of program spendingTraining and education: in 2025, Project Harmony training institute filled 23,906 training seats, offering over 35 unique courses in a variety of modalities including in-person sessions, instructor-led virtual courses and complete asynchronous content. Professionals and community members were trained on the aspects of child trauma and maltreatment, reporting abuse, and skill building when working with children and families to improve the community response to vulnerable children. The training impacted professionals from the metro omaha area and broadened across the nation and in several countries.
$1,007,457 spent$249,240 earned by the program8% of program spendingCoordination: Project Harmony provides coordination of the multidisciplinary teams responding to child abuse cases. In 2025, there were 13 such teams meeting regularly to ensure that child abuse investigations are properly coordinated across agencies, that the information is shared, and the systems are improved. During 2025, 175 mdt meetings were held reviewing over 1,000 cases. The case coordinators were established under nebraska statute to ensure collaboration across disciplines during the investigation of childabuse.
$871,825 spent7% of program spending
The 8 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $11,958,453.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $45M to $58M (+30%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 11% · 2018 15% · 2019 13% · 2020 18% · 2021 21% · 2022 16% · 2023 26% · 2024 22% · 2025 43%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
88% of PROJECT HARMONY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Gene Klein
Chief executive officer
Board chair
Mike Jung
Chairman
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 26 funders to 53 funders, grant income rose $3.9M → $5.6M.
12 of 96 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PROJECT HARMONY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 96 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
PROJECT HARMONY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 37% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 58% · 2018 67% · 2019 55% · 2020 31% · 2021 30% · 2022 38% · 2023 21% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
56% of PROJECT HARMONY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
95% of PROJECT HARMONY's grant income comes from Nebraska funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
PROJECT HARMONY holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 165 crime & legal nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 165 crime & legal nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025
Government funding PROJECT HARMONY receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.3M on record.
- Department of Health and Human Services$2.0M
- Department of Justice$298k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like PROJECT HARMONY
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Nebraska
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
79% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
75%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT HARMONY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY?
- PROJECT HARMONY (Nebraska) receives grants from 96 organizations whose IRS filings report $53,754,066 to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($19,793,401). 64 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does PROJECT HARMONY have?
- IRS filings report 96 organizations giving $53,754,066 in grants to PROJECT HARMONY, 64 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of PROJECT HARMONY?
- THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $19,793,401 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like PROJECT HARMONY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 96 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing