· Public charity
Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation
To eliminate health inequities by advocating for and investing in community-driven solutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $168,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $186,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH | $25,000 |
| SALES TAX FOR EDUCATORS | $15,000 |
| NC COUNTS COALITION | $12,500 |
| LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA | $12,500 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLI | $12,500 |
| DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC7× · 2017–2023 · $3.4M · revenue +30%
- GAGUILFORD ADULT HEALTH INC7× · 2017–2023 · $2.9M · revenue +11% · 67% of their budget
- TTTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +300%
Funded once
- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY CARE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $141k · revenue -90%
CAROLINA ABORTION FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +25%- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc2× · 2017–2023 · $100k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…
To educate, advocate, and innovate for a better healthcare delivery system in nc.
To promote health and resilience through progressive approaches that integrate evidence-based substance use prevention programming, harm reduction, and multifaceted systems of care.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.
To serve as greensboro, north carolina's principal economic and community development organization. our goal is to strategically develop a vibrant community that creates, expands, and attracts business while advancing the quality of life…
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro Housing Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Helping Hands Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD ADULT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds MOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES OF GUILFORD INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds SHIFT NC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds KELLIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds YWCA Greensboro ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION GREENSBORO ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds North Carolina Aids Action Network ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GENERATIONED ↗
- Who funds MONARCH ↗
- Who funds RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds North Carolina Health News Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC ↗
- Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds New Hope Community Development Group ↗
- Who funds CARE SHARE HEALTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHEELS4HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Weaver Foundation Inc · David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · The Joseph M Bryan Foundation · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.