How much did MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER grant in FY2024?

Education$388MHealth$25MHuman Services$559kCrime & Legal$495kAnimals$350kInternational$305kCommunity Improvement$274kArts & Culture$273kPhilanthropy$251kOther$163M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

cabriniinfants childrenchildren adolescentsadolescents youngyoung adultsunderserved accessrespect

2019

organskilled nursingvisionpediatricsecurehudson valleyrehabilitation

2020

bgcmvpartnerpremisesfinanciallyjacobimembersconsumer

2021

valeriechildren cancercancer bloodblood disorderscity'scancer diseaseslargest

2022

pancreatic cancerbeyondimprovementartsdiversecancer researchculture

2023

plantslgbtqbeliefpancreatic cancervan cortlandtcortlandt parkcatholic

2024

womenadvocacy researchhousingalzheimer'scurecancerkidney

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k10 grants · $211k
$50k–250k2 grants · $240k
$250k+1 grant · $680k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.0B

Total assets

Largest grants

NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION$680,066
BRONX CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC$180,488
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$60,000
CITY IN THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$32,500
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA$25,000
ST JOHN'S RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL$25,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW YORK$25,000
NYU FORENSIC MEDICINE SUPPORT FUND$25,000
RENEWAL OF LIFE INC$20,000
COOPER SQUARE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INC$18,110
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION INC$15,000
AMERICAN LIVER FOUNDATION$15,000
WOMEN IN DEVELOPMENT NEW YORK$10,000
WESTWOOD MANOR LLC$8,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $559k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$575M · 83 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

83 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$575M

$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+29%

Still filing today

87%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AE
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
4× · 2020–2023 · $387M · revenue +305% · 31% of their budget
WP
White Plains Hospital Medical Center
3× · 2017–2019 · $22M · revenue +98%
BL
bronx lebanon hospital center
8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +40%

Funded once

MN
MONTEFIORE NORTH AMBULATORY CARE CENTER INC
one grant, 2017 · $1.3M · 89% of their budget
RF
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
one grant, 2023 · $311k · revenue +7%
AO
ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIAN PHYSICIANS
one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -22% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

Bronx County Medical Society

Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy

Health

Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox Hill Hospital Medical, PC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care.

Health

Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist

To provide excellent health care services in a compassionate and humane manner to the people who live and work in brooklyn and its surrounding areas

—

Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To offer responsive and quality healthcare to the new york community while fulfilling the educational and entrepreneurial needs of our members.

Health

New York Medical College

Educate physicians, scientists, public health specialists & other healthcare professionals.

—

The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities.

Health

Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Mjhs Medical Associates Pc

To practice the profession of medicine for affiliates of metropolitan jewish health system inc., which provide medical and health services in brooklyn, new york.

Health

Nyu Langone Hospitals

Nyu langone hospitals' trifold mission to serve, teach, and discover is achieved daily through an integrated academic culture devoted to excellence in patient care, education, and research.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Nyack Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Barnabas Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.6%1/156

the rest of the field

10%

6,058/61,902

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

141 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

137/141

Grantees still filing

100/141

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$387,671,901Other$164,015,747Health$25,253,903Human Services$558,500Crime & Legal$495,000Animals$350,000International$305,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY42.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University · Altman Foundation · Health Insurance Plan of Greater New · Hispanic Federation Inc · Somos Healthcare Providers Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · 1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers East · New Yankee Stadium Community Benefits Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIAN PHYSICIANS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~48 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 330643166 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIAN PHYSICIANS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 48 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Montefiore Medical Center?

Find your warmest path to Montefiore Medical Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

141 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Montefiore Medical Center?

More from the funding graph

MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

141 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Montefiore Medical Center?

More from the funding graph