· Public charity
Somos Healthcare Providers Inc
Somos healthcare providers, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $89,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $136,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City & State NY LLC | $28,750 |
| Regional Aid for Interim Needs INC | $15,000 |
| Path to Peace Foundation | $10,000 |
| MEDISYS HEALTH NETWORK Inc | $10,000 |
| Dominico-American Society of Queens Inc | $10,000 |
| Caribbean American Center of New York Inc | $8,000 |
| Chinatown Health Clinic Foundation Inc | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DMDOMINICAN MEDICAL-DENTAL COMMUNITY OUTREACH SOCIETY INC3× · 2019–2023 · $186k · revenue +34%
- MCMAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $180k · revenue +581%
- PTPATH TO PEACE FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $152k · revenue +401%
Funded once
- TMTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITYone grant, 2018 · $350k · revenue -89%
- MCMEREDITH CORPORATIONone grant, 2019 · $175k
- CCCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMERone grant, 2022 · $80k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Social services agency targeting primarily the hispanic/minority elderly. the agency is multi service and multicultural service.
To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.
To develop the intellectual and creative minds of latino youth to enter and continue their education in the professions, arts, and technical fields to solve community problems.
The organization was formed to improve the health and social well being of puerto rican / latinos and other underserved communities through community based research, direct service, advocacy, and training.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Hispanocare's mission is to provide affordable, quality, bilingual, bicultural healthcare to chicago's latino community. an important part of our mission is to actively participate in community outreach. these outreach activities provide…
Hafs mission is to improve health outcomes for latinos in nyc who are affected by hiv and other chronic illnesses. haf fulfils this mission by integrating prevention and education into a set of multi-faceted wellness programs.
Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…
At apicha community health center, our mission is to provide high quality, equitable, whole person, and culturally responsive care delivered in an inclusive and welcoming manner.
Promote educational excellence, leadership, & service via a strong commitment to our students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ehn Foundation Co Emilio Villegas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds MARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOMINICAN MEDICAL-DENTAL COMMUNITY OUTREACH SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATH TO PEACE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds VACATION IS A RIGHT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASOCIACION NACIONAL DE SACERDOTES HISPANOS ↗
- Who funds Dominican Womens Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION MMM INC ↗
- Who funds 1199 SEIU EMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds SOMOS INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO GERONTOLOGICO LATINO INC ↗
- Who funds EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOMINICAN DAY PARADE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDISYS HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION LEAGUE CLUB ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION RAMON PANE INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Montefiore Medical Center · Knights of Columbus · Hispanic Federation Inc · Healthfirst Foundation Inc · 1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers East · Transport Workers Union of Greater New York Local 100 · Adams Family Foundation · Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York · Select Equity Group Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Somos Healthcare Providers Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.