Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Moglia Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
104
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Community Improvement$18MEducation$6.3MRecreation & Sports$3.4MArts & Culture$2.4MHealth$1.6MHuman Services$1.2MYouth Development$1.1MReligion$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 104 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k53 grants · $937k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$10,500
Median grant
23
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY$500,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$400,000
FORDHAM PREPARATORY SCHOOL$341,000
BENTLEY UNIVERSITY$250,000
Individual grant recipient$200,000
RISE$150,000
IRISH ARTS CENTER$110,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$100,000
MISERICORDIA HOME$100,000
SAY THE STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG$100,000
DOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST$100,000
CHICAGO LIONS CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION$100,000
CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
ARCHMERE ACADEMY$84,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GRAND STRAND$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $1k → 9%SAW ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $71k → 15%WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $2k → 7%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $15k → 17%HELP 4 KIDS: $5k → 13%UNICO NATIONAL: $10k → 16%BELLEVUE TOGETHER: $15k → 6%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $15k → 17%UNICO NATIONAL: $10k → 16%BELLEVUE TOGETHER: $5k → 6%UNICO NATIONAL: $10k → 16%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN VETERANS: $2k → 14%BELLEVUE TOGETHER: $5k → 6%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN VETERANS: $2k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $275k → 14%UNICO NATIONAL: $10k → 16%DFRC: $10k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 10%MISERICORDIA HOME: $100k → 14%DFRC: $10k → 10%MISERICORDIA HOME: $100k → 14%DFRC: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $100k → 10%SHEPHERD'S TABLE: $15k → 13%GUADALUPE CENTER: $100k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $100k → 10%ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE: $1k → 17%ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE: $1k → 17%ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE: $1k → 17%ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39M · 116 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

116 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
87

Total granted

$39M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+1%

Still filing today

70%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $381k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +9%
  • BENTLEY UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +18%
  • FU
    Fordham University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $757k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • WT
    WE TAKE IT FOR CHARITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $568k · revenue +30%
  • RA
    RISE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $355k · revenue 0%
  • UF
    UNICO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $213k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Challenge Unlimited Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mark Vincent Pelini Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersFaith-Based Social ServicesCommunity Food PantriesSenior Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEquine Therapy ProgramsUnited Way AffiliatesAnimal Rescue and ShelterElementary Literacy TutoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Military Veterans SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsAddiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%40%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/173
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,392

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 244 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
151/155
Grantees still filing
83/155
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Various 501C3Organizations — $17,965,505 · OtherVarious 501C3OrganizationsIndividual grant recipient — $4,250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFORDHAM PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $1,380,000 · Other+111 more — $6,452,535 · Other+111 moreCHANTICLEER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION — $2,152,395 · EducationCHANTICLEER ATHL…CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY — $1,600,000 · EducationCHICAGO HOPE ACA…BENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 · EducationBENTLEY UNIVERSI…Fordham University — $756,500 · EducationFordham Universi…CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL — $485,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NEW Y…+17 more — $303,310 · EducationSTUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG INC — $888,000 · Arts & CultureAN CLAIDHEAMH SOLUIS INC — $619,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC — $284,250 · Arts & CultureGreat Lakes Center for the Arts — $129,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $120,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC — $106,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $188,000 · Arts & CultureSTRAIGHT AND NARROW INC — $500,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $235,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $70,000 · HealthCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $60,000 · HealthSAVE A WARRIOR INC — $50,000 · Health+12 more — $148,545 · HealthMISERICORDIA HOME — $475,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center Inc — $300,000 · Human ServicesSAW Endowment Foundation — $71,000 · Human ServicesUNICO NATIONAL INC — $40,000 · Human Services+7 more — $113,000 · Human ServicesWE TAKE IT FOR CHARITY INC — $568,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JCK FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · PhilanthropyGenYOUTH Incorporated — $35,000 · PhilanthropyAUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $30,000 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $65,000 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO LIONS CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION — $300,000 · Recreation & SportsSOUTH CAROLINA FOOTBALL HALL OF FAM — $292,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsBEAT THE STREETS WRESTLING PROGRAM PHILADELPHIA — $50,000 · Recreation & Sports+7 more — $81,100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$30,048,040Education$6,297,205Arts & Culture$2,334,250Health$1,063,545Human Services$999,000Philanthropy$783,000Recreation & Sports$773,100

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHANTICLEER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION — $2,152,395 over 4y, 56% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY — $1,600,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG INC — $888,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetFordham University — $756,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAN CLAIDHEAMH SOLUIS INC — $619,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetWE TAKE IT FOR CHARITY INC — $568,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSTRAIGHT AND NARROW INC — $500,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL — $485,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME — $475,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRISE ACADEMY — $355,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHICAGO LIONS CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION — $300,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA FOOTBALL HALL OF FAM — $292,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetCOLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC — $284,250 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetGLOBAL COALITION ON SUSTAINABILITY FKA US COALITION ON SUSTAINABILITY — $283,000 over 3y, 76% of budgetDRIVEN FOUNDATION — $252,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $235,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC — $225,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST — $200,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE GRAND STRAND INC — $195,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetHAVE DREAMS — $175,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $155,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts — $129,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $120,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC — $106,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL — $95,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEBRASKA GREATS FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSAW Endowment Foundation — $71,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $62,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MORLON GREENWOOD FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JCK FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSAVE A WARRIOR INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS WRESTLING PROGRAM PHILADELPHIA — $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetACDS INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNICO NATIONAL INC — $40,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS — $40,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetAT EASE USA — $35,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated — $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHANTICLEER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG INC ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds AN CLAIDHEAMH SOLUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds WE TAKE IT FOR CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds STRAIGHT AND NARROW INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds RISE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO LIONS CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA FOOTBALL HALL OF FAM ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL COALITION ON SUSTAINABILITY FKA US COALITION ON SUSTAINABILITY ↗
  • Who funds DRIVEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE GRAND STRAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Lakes Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary …The Lozier FoundationThe Hawks FoundationWaccamaw Community Fo…Midlands Community Fo…Robert B Daugherty Fo…The Sherwood Foundati…The Holland FoundationMammel Family Foundat…Seline Family Foundat…Viola Foundation IncThe Dorothy B Davis F…
The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE31.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Waccamaw Community Foundation · Midlands Community Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Mammel Family Foundation · Seline Family Foundation · Viola Foundation Inc · The Dorothy B Davis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moglia Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Straight and Narrow Inc — 65% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Dfrc Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Little Sisters of the Poor Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Bentley University — 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 244 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home