· Private foundation
Seline Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k36 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| ST MARGARET MARY CHURCH | $45,000 |
| ST MARGARET MARY CHURCH | $26,250 |
| OUR LADY OF ASSUMPTION | $25,000 |
| NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS | $10,500 |
| MID-AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| EDUCATE UGANDA | $5,000 |
| OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST MARK'S LUTHERAN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF OMAHA | $4,000 |
| WESTSIDE FOUNDATION | $3,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $616k · revenue +31%
- CCCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF OMAHA NEBRASKA6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +181% · 25% of their budget
- CUCreighton University6× · 2020–2025 · $101k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- LALOGOS ACADEMYone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +19%
- NWNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -3%
- MSMADONNA SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICESone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.
Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…
The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.
The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.
Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members
Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…
Girls incorporated of omaha serves girls of ages 5 through 18 with various gender specific programs designed to provide the girls with activities and experiences which meet their needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Joyce Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF OMAHA NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds LOGOS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATE UGANDA ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LAUNCH LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF OMAHA NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds Assure Womens Center ↗
- Who funds BENSON HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QUALITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST ↗
- Who funds GREATER OMAHA CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA ↗
- Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seline Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Seline Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Seline Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.