Skip to content
Mogg Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mogg Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$155kHousing & Shelter$72kInternational$55kPhilanthropy$45kReligion$40kHuman Services$39kEducation$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAYTON FOUNDATION$15,002
SAMARITANS PURSE$15,000
SEND RELIEF INC$10,000
BRIGHT FOCUS FOUNDATION$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC$10,000
BABY QUEST FOUNDATION$10,000
LEARN TO EARN DAYTON$7,000
CHERRY STREET MISSION$7,000
ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$6,400
PIONEERS$5,000
MISSION HISPANA MISSION SOCIETY INC$5,000
CHILDREN HAVE OPTIONS IN CARING ENVIRONMENTS INC$5,000
FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC$5,000
HOPE HOUSE OF NAPLES INC$83
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 14%HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
OH
CA
CO
MD
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Mogg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mogg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$320k · 13 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$320k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+9%

Still filing today

69%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +106%
  • BQ
    Baby Quest Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +261%
  • BF
    BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Elizabeth's New Life Center Inc

Provide complete and caring pregnancy services (without prejudice to religion, age, race, gender, marital status or income level) through its women's centers and prenatal care facility, as well as provide marriage enrichment, healthy…

Human Services
3
Amnion Women's Center

Amnion's mission is to share the gospel of jesus christ and to protect and advocate for the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.

Health
4
One Heart Worldwide

Our mission is to end all preventable deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth worldwide. our vision is to improve access to, and utilization of, quality healthcare services to reduce the risk of maternal and neonatal mortality in remote…

Human Services
5
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
6
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
7
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
8
Life Choices Clinic and Care Center

To develop and administer programs designed to assist families in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, spiritual, and socioeconomic problems associated with pregnancy.

Health
9
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
10
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
11
Aim Women's Center

The mission of aim is to help women choose life by giving them the support they need to have a healthy pregnancy, birth, and family life.

—
12
Dakota Hope Clinic

Dakota hope offers services that empower women and men to make choices about sexual health and pregnancy that will help them and their children to have a bright future. these services include pregnancy tests, ultrasound, and evidence-based…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Storks; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISION HISPANA MISSION SOCIETY INC: $17,550 · OtherMISION HISPANA MISSION SOCIETY INCOSU THE JAMES CANCER FUND: $15,000 · OtherOSU THE JAMES CANCER FUNDSAMARITANS PURSE: $15,000 · OtherSAMARITANS PURSESEND RELIEF INC: $15,000 · OtherSEND RELIEF INCFAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST: $10,000 · OtherFAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC: $7,500 · OtherGRACE POINT FELLOWSHIP INC: $7,500 · OtherARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6,400 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCInternational Neighborhood Collaborative: $7,500 · Other+11 more: $47,583 · Other+11 moreBaby Quest Foundation Inc: $50,000 · HealthBaby Quest Foundation IncBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATIONSave the Storks: $20,000 · HealthSave the StorksNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDA…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $62,000 · Housing & ShelterCHERRY STREET MISS…SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $55,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S P…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $7,000 · EducationTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $15,002 · PhilanthropyPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$169,033Health$120,000Housing & Shelter$77,000Religion$55,000Education$17,000Philanthropy$15,002Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $62,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaby Quest Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSave the Storks: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $15,002 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Neighborhood Collaborative: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC: $7,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN HAVE OPTIONS IN CARING ENVIRONMENTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Servant FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …The Chicago Community…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Enterprise Holdings F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Paypal Charitable Giv…Natl Christian Charit…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for Good
The Dayton FoundationOH19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mogg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mogg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mogg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home