· Private foundation
Mogg Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k8 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAYTON FOUNDATION | $15,002 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $15,000 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC | $10,000 |
| SEND RELIEF INC | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC | $10,000 |
| BRIGHT FOCUS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BABY QUEST FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LEARN TO EARN DAYTON | $7,000 |
| CHERRY STREET MISSION | $7,000 |
| ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | $6,400 |
| MISSION HISPANA MISSION SOCIETY INC | $5,000 |
| FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN HAVE OPTIONS IN CARING ENVIRONMENTS INC | $5,000 |
| PIONEERS | $5,000 |
| HOPE HOUSE OF NAPLES INC | $83 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Mogg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE3× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +106%
- BQBaby Quest Foundation Inc6× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +261%
- BFBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +94%
Funded once
- OSOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +3%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
- PRPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Provide complete and caring pregnancy services (without prejudice to religion, age, race, gender, marital status or income level) through its women's centers and prenatal care facility, as well as provide marriage enrichment, healthy…
Amnion's mission is to share the gospel of jesus christ and to protect and advocate for the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.
Our mission is to end all preventable deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth worldwide. our vision is to improve access to, and utilization of, quality healthcare services to reduce the risk of maternal and neonatal mortality in remote…
Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…
The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…
To improve the health of those we serve.
To develop and administer programs designed to assist families in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, spiritual, and socioeconomic problems associated with pregnancy.
Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
The mission of aim is to help women choose life by giving them the support they need to have a healthy pregnancy, birth, and family life.
Dakota hope offers services that empower women and men to make choices about sexual health and pregnancy that will help them and their children to have a bright future. these services include pregnancy tests, ultrasound, and evidence-based…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Storks and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Baby Quest Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Save the Storks ↗
- Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds International Neighborhood Collaborative ↗
- Who funds FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds LEARN TO EARN DAYTON ↗
- Who funds ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN HAVE OPTIONS IN CARING ENVIRONMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mogg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.