Skip to content
Mitio Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Mitio Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$401kReligion$181kEducation$46kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$10kHousing & Shelter$7kCommunity Improvement$6kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH BRIDGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 56% of grant dollars ($379k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 44% that went abroad ($300k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $429 → 14%VIRTUOUS WOMEN LIFE ACADEMY: $2k → 8%VIRTUOUS WOMEN LIFE ACADEMY: $480 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 44% of all-years giving ($300k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Egypt$200k · 2 grants
Israel$100k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 9 repeat orgs$445k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
27

Total granted

$234k
$445k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+36%

Still filing today

56%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT CHURCH INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $177k
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $23k
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH CORPORATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • EQ
    EL QASR AINY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SZ
    SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CU
    CAIRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Worldwide Ltd

Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.

International
2
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
3
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
4
World Without Orphans Global

World without orphans (wwo) global's vision is that every child would grow up in a safe and loving family, know their heavenly father, and reach their god-given purpose. wwo global's mission is to call and equip national leaders to…

International
5
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
6
God's Littlest Angels Inc

God's littlest angels facilitates the development of healthy kids, empowered families, and stronger communities while sharing the hope and love of jesus christ.

International
7
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
8
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
9
Human Rights for Kids

Human Rights for Kids is an international non-profit organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights for children. We use an integrated, multi-faceted approach which consists of research & public education, coalition…

International
10
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
11
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
12
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Give an Hour Nonprofit Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Generation Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT CHURCH INC: $177,221 · OtherTURNING POINT CHURCH INCEL QASR AINY HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherEL QASR AINY HOSPITALSHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · OtherSHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTERCAIRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherCAIRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITALPRENANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $50,000 · OtherPRENANCY RESOURCE CENTERMASSANUTTEN MILITARY ACADEMY: $40,501 · OtherMASSANUTTEN MILITARY ACADEMYPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $22,988 · Other+17 more: $45,904 · Other+17 moreTHE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH CORPORATION: $13,723 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,949 · HealthTHE GIVE AN HOUR NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,715 · HealthApraxia Kids: $2,590 · Health+1 more: $706 · HealthGENERATION HOPE: $2,500 · EducationSTRONG ROCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $2,500 · EducationSAFEHOUSE OUTREACH INC: $3,403 · ReligionCAMP CORRAL: $3,180 · Youth DevelopmentVIRTUOUS WOMEN LIFE ACADEMY INC: $2,186 · Human ServicesHope for Justice Inc: $429 · Human ServicesTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,739 · Philanthropy
Other$636,614Health$26,683Education$5,000Religion$3,403Youth Development$3,180Human Services$2,615Philanthropy$1,739

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELPING IN HIS NAME MINISTRIES INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH CORPORATION: $13,723 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,949 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $5,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOUSE OUTREACH INC: $3,403 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP CORRAL: $3,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GIVE AN HOUR NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,715 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetApraxia Kids: $2,590 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGENERATION HOPE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRONG ROCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRTUOUS WOMEN LIFE ACADEMY INC: $2,186 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,739 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $1,133 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL: $990 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Life Alliance Inc: $706 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION: $488 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIDOS LATINO ASSOCIATION INC: $480 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHope for Justice Inc: $429 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNatl Christian Charit…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Duke Energy FoundationNC11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mitio Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mitio Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mitio Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mitio Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mitio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home