Skip to content

· Private foundation

Meltzer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$23kHuman Services$11kEducation$9kCivil Rights$4kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$3kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$520
Median grant
6
States reached
$172k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Family Services$2,591
Hadassah$2,000
Jewish Family Services$1,040
Washington University Department of Ophthalmology$1,000
March of Dimes$530
Jewish Colorado$523
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$520
Food Bank Rockies$520
Michigan Bnai Brith Hillel Foundation Inc$261
Individual grant recipient$260
Wild Animal Sanctuary$260
Parker Task Force$260
Individual grant recipient$260
Joseph Slifka Center Jewish Life at Yale University$259
Shalom Park$141
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Shalom Park: $141 → 8%Shalom Park: $50 → 8%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 12%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 12%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 12%Jewish Family Services: $1k → 12%Jewish Family Services: $500 → 12%Jewish Family Services: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
CT
UT
CO
MO
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 20 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$66k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2022 · $6k · revenue +76%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • JF
    Jewish Famiily Services
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KOL AMI
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • CC
    Cherry Creek High School
    one grant, 2018 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Denver Academy of Torah

Denver academy of torah (the "school")provides education to students from kindergarten through high school. the school's mission is to nuture students to be torah-observant role models and future leaders through an intellectually rigorous…

Education
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Denver Jewish Day School

To ensure a jewish future by challenging minds and nurturing souls with a focus on academic excellence and jewish learning.

Education
5
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
6
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
7
Jewish Community Centers of Denver

Provide recreational, cultural, education, and social programs to the community.

Human Services
8
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
9
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel of Colorado seeks to engage, empower, and work with Jewish college students to create Jewish communities at University of Denver, Colorado State University, Auraria Campus, Colorado School of Mines and other front range…

—
10
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
11
Denver Bar Association

To promote justice, its administration, and its availability to all sectors of society; to support and assist the membership in the delivery of legal services; to uphold the honor and dignity of the bar, and foster respect for the legal…

—
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hadassah Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Washington University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hadassah: $17,750 · OtherHadassahIndividual grant recipient: $11,520 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE: $2,750 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIEWashington University Department of Ophthalmology: $2,250 · Other+28 more: $14,143 · Other+28 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $9,532 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY …+1 more: $191 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationWASHINGTO…CARLETON COLLEGE: $750 · EducationCARLETON …DENVER ACADEMY INC: $250 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,375 · Civil RightsROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $3,421 · Recreation & SportsJEWISHColorado: $1,044 · PhilanthropyTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $250 · PhilanthropyMARCH OF DIMES INC: $630 · HealthTALL TALES RANCH: $250 · Health
Other$48,413Human Services$9,723Education$6,500Civil Rights$4,375Recreation & Sports$3,421Philanthropy$1,294Health$880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $9,532 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,375 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $3,421 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE: $2,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $1,044 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $663 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $630 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC: $261 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBirds of Prey Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TALES RANCH: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ACADEMY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM PARK: $191 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $154 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Birds of Prey Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CONCERT BAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TALL TALES RANCH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM PARK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meltzer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meltzer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Meltzer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph