Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McFadden Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$249kEnvironment$24kArts & Culture$11kAnimals$9kHousing & Shelter$8kEducation$2kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$457k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Future Smiles$15,000
Friends of Red Rock Canyon$1,000
Agape House of Prescott$1,000
Friends of Nevada Wilderness$1,000
Friends of Arizona PBS$1,000
Southern Nevada Public Television$1,000
Prescott Area Habitat for Humanity$1,000
Yavapai Food Bank$1,000
Nevada Public Radio$1,000
Coalition for Compassion and Justic$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Agape House of Prescott: $1k → 14%Agape House of Prescott: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$298k · 18 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$298k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+16%

Still filing today

89%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • NH
    NEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +57%
  • AA
    Animal Ark Incorporated
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -9%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +21%
  • 3
    350ORG
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

6
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
7
Environment Now
8
Sierra Nevada Alliance

To protect and restore sierra lands, water, wildlife and rural communities. to engage and support efforts to adopt exemplary local sustainable community actions accross the sierra nevada that balance social, economic and environmental…

Environment
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
11
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
12
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nrdc Action Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Government Accountability R…Homeless Services & ShelterPublic University Foundatio…Food Pantries & AssistanceWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Animal Rescue and AdoptionAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Developmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number35%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr7%26%35–55yr8%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value35%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%86%10–20yr14%5%20–35yr7%5%35–55yr8%4%55yr+

The field is 35% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
20%
2,502/12,347

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FUTURE SMILES — $248,500 · HealthFUTURE SMILESTHE ENVIROLUTION INC — $3,000 · EnvironmentThe Sierra Fund — $3,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $2,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $2,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN NEVADA CONSERVANCY — $2,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF RED ROCK CANYON — $2,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $1,000 · Environment350ORG — $1,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC DBA PRESCOTT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $1,000 · OtherASU Foundation Arizona PBS — $1,000 · OtherNRDC ACTION FUND INC — $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · OtherDIRECT RELIEF — $1,000 · OtherUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,000 · OtherNEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Other+5 more — $2,500 · OtherNEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 · AnimalsAnimal Ark Incorporated — $3,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,500 · AnimalsNEVADA PUBLIC RADIO — $5,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN NEVADA PUBLIC TELEVISION — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCOALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterAGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesYavapai Food Bank Inc — $2,000 · Human Services
Health$248,500Environment$18,000Other$23,000Animals$9,000Arts & Culture$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Human Services$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFUTURE SMILES — $248,500 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEVADA PUBLIC RADIO — $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Ark Incorporated — $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ENVIROLUTION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Sierra Fund — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYavapai Food Bank Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN NEVADA CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RED ROCK CANYON — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC DBA PRESCOTT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget350ORG — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN NEVADA PUBLIC TELEVISION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNRDC ACTION FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NV Energy Charitable FoundationNV23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Binion Family Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Margaret T Morris Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McFadden Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McFadden Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McFadden Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph