· Private foundation
Mars Hq Regional Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k100 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK | $300,000 |
| CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| PRETEND CITY THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ORANGE COUNTY | $100,000 |
| ELON UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC | $31,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION | $31,000 |
| MCLEAN PROJECT FOR THE ARTS | $25,000 |
| WASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA | $21,000 |
| VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES | $21,000 |
| ARCS FOUNDATION - METRO WASHINGTON CHAPTER | $21,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER | $20,000 |
| EARTH FORCE INC | $20,000 |
| ST MARY'S HEALTH WAGON INC | $20,000 |
| WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $16,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE FOR RURAL COLLEGES | $16,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $436k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
114 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $445k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +39%
- PCPRETEND CITY THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ORANGE COUNTY5× · 2020–2024 · $445k · revenue +56%
- TNTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH5× · 2020–2024 · $153k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- PCPRETEND CITY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM (JBMABA)one grant, 2022 · $100k
- EUELON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $50k
- HPHYACINTH'S PLACEone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
A non-profit established in 1998, the cultural landscape foundation (tclf) connects people to places. tclf educates and engages the public to make our shared landscape heritage more visible, identify its value, and empower its stewards.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union and the most unlike its peers is The Washington Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PRETEND CITY THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH ↗
- Who funds Capital Hospice ↗
- Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER INC ↗
- Who funds VA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA ↗
- Who funds Claremont McKenna College ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds THE AMAZON BIODIVERSITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
- Who funds Hancock Shaker Village Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION FOR THOMAS JEFFERSON'S POPLAR FOREST ↗
- Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK STUDENT FUND ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CONSERVATION - FRIENDS OF THE MASAI MARA ↗
- Who funds CHORAL ARTS SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN REDISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC ↗
- Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
- Who funds Rebuilding Together DC Alexandria ↗
- Who funds EQUINE LAND CONSERVATION RESOURCE ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION ↗
- Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE ↗
- Who funds THE VIRGINIA COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds FAIRFAX CHORAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE JOBS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation · World Bank Community Connections Fund · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mars Hq Regional Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- EcoHealth Alliance Inc — 24% of income from government
- Imagination Stage Inc — 13% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Hancock Shaker Village Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Capital Hospice — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mars Hq Regional Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Mars Hq Regional Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.