How much did ADA L AND ALBERT M WIBEL FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of ADA L AND ALBERT M WIBEL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

ministriesarlingtonlittleshelterhospicechildfood

2019

inovahospicefood

2020

hospicechildfood

2021

inovagreaterarlingtonshepherdfallshospice

2022

greaterbankagingmontgomeryvillagejewishfood

2023

housingkitchenchildcapitalfood

2024

alexandriafood

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $12k
$10k–50k23 grants · $267k

$11,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

SEABURY RESOURCES FOR AGING$25,250
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF NORTHERN VA$11,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF$11,000
MY SISTER'S PLACE$11,000
CARINGMATTERS$11,000
WE ARE FAMILY SENIOR OUTREACH$11,000
FOOD & FRIENDS$11,000
BREAD FOR THE CITY INC$11,000
HOME CARE PARTNERS INC$11,000
PARKINSON FOUNDATION OF THE NATIONAL$11,000
DOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES$11,000
FACETS$11,000
HERNDON VILLAGE NETWORK$11,000
NEIGHBOR RIDE$11,000
THE FENWICK FOUNDATION$11,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 6%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.9M · 53 repeat orgs$602k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$491k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+43%

Still filing today

60%

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SS
SENIOR SERVICES OF ALEXANDRIA
5× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +14%
IM
INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER
4× · 2017–2021 · $53k · revenue +58%
IS
IONA SENIOR SERVICES
4× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +17%

Funded once

VP
VHC PEDIATRICS
one grant, 2022 · $14k
AL
ABRAHAM & LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED
one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +15%
BJ
BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON
one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. In 2022 230 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals to 238 clients. We are mission-focused growth-oriented and committed to serving our community.

—

Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services

Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc

Specializing in services to the aging, meals on wheels of central maryland serves homebound aging and disabled adults to keep them living safely and independently in their homes and communities. by providing nutritious, home-delivered…

Food & Nutrition

Washington Voa Living Center

Low-income housing.

—

Partners in Care Maryland Inc

Partners in care, inc is dedicated to heplinng older adults live independently in their own homes and remain actively engaged in their communities.

Philanthropy

Capital Manor Inc

Capital Manor is a continuing care, non-profit organization committed to meeting the physical, social, emotional and spiritual needs of our residents.

Human Services

Northwest Neighbors Village

Enable older adults to thrive as they age in our community

Human Services

Nourishing Bethesda Inc

Fighting food insecurity in our area by providing nutritious food and community support to our neighbors in need, as well as offering and linking our clients to wraparound resources that will enable them to build healthy and stable lives.

Human Services

Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition

Manna uses nutrition to improve health for people with serious illnesses who need nourishment to heal. by providing medically tailored meals and nutrition education, we empower people to improve their health and quality of life.

Food & Nutrition

Arlington Thrive

Arlington Thrive provides timely assistance to help our neighbors in need so they can develop the capacity to be stable, secure and thrive in their jobs, health and homes.

Human Services

Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition

Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Hospice Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bender Jcc of Greater Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/57

the rest of the field

11%

3,202/30,362

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

56 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

55/56

Grantees still filing

47/56

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,453,500Human Services$475,450Food & Nutrition$248,500Health$237,000Housing & Shelter$72,200Education$30,200Arts & Culture$24,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC51.6× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern · Lillian R Wardman Irr Tr · Dimick Foundation · Act for Alexandria · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Cloudbreak Foundation Inc · The Washington Home Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ADA L AND ALBERT M WIBEL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AT HOME IN ALEXANDRIA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~15 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +87% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 264557978 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AT HOME IN ALEXANDRIA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 15 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ADA L AND ALBERT M WIBEL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

56 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ADA L AND ALBERT M WIBEL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

56 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation?

More from the funding graph