· Private foundation
Mark and Karen Luebke Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $292k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $362k
Anchored by a single position — about 98% of reported assets are held in Vocational Training Institutes Inc.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DESERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR | $60,475 |
| HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA | $51,210 |
| SWEET LIFE RESCUE CENTER | $50,000 |
| PAZ DE CRISTO | $50,000 |
| BELOVED ASHEVILLE | $50,000 |
| CARP | $35,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS | $25,000 |
| SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME | $25,000 |
| AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS | $25,000 |
| AMAZIMA MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| LUCK'S RESCUE | $20,000 |
| FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NO LONGER BOUND | $15,000 |
| LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION | $11,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $690k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $186k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDesert Christian Schools Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $250k · revenue +8%
- HOHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA5× · 2020–2024 · $166k · revenue +56%
- PDPaz De Cristo Community Center4× · 2021–2024 · $162k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- TPTHE PAWERFUL RESCUEone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -32%
- TATHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +49%
- BYBARN YARD EQUINEone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -87%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
One love arizona's mission is to spark brighter futures for people and pets through life-saving programs.
Homeward bound is a no-kill adoption center dedicated to saving the lives of homeless cats in the las vegas valley and providing a humane recourse for people in distress who are no longer able to care for their cats- offering an…
Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
The purpose of argos, a shelter dog rescue is: to rescue animals from situations that are abusive, endangering, or neglectful. to rescue animals in danger of being euthanized in new mexico shelters/pounds. to provide necessary veterinary…
Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f
Lovebugs rescue is a foster-based animal rescue located in southern california. we began our mission in october 2010 and focus on rescuing dogs from high kill shelters and neglect. we rescue all breeds and all ages. we provide all medical…
Animal rescue
We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.
Our mission is to provide compassionate services to pets and people in crisis.
Freedom Brothers Rescue and Recovery is a non-profit, no-kill, volunteer animal rescue and recovery organization serving the Phoenix Arizona area.
The mission of Border Animal Rescue, Inc (BAR) is the reduction of animal overpopulation through spay and neuter programs and to promote the adoption of unwanted, homeless pets by caring for them in foster homes, providing medical care,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunshine Acres Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jamies Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Desert Christian Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Paz De Cristo Community Center ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SWEET LIFE RESCUE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds Amputee Blade Runners ↗
- Who funds ONE SMALL STEP INC CLOTHES CABIN ↗
- Who funds FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Amazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East ↗
- Who funds SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND ↗
- Who funds THE PAWERFUL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds Foreverland Farm ↗
- Who funds THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Gilbert Youth Soccer Association ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Lucks Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds STARBRIGHT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds JAMIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Healing Hearts Animal Rescue and Refuge ↗
- Who funds NO LONGER BOUND INC ↗
- Who funds BARN YARD EQUINE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS VEGAS ↗
- Who funds Highland Band Boosters ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wynn Resorts Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Abba's Storehouse Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Thunderbirds Charities · Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mark and Karen Luebke Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.