Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Abba's Storehouse Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$18MPhilanthropy$1.8MReligion$795kHuman Services$623kHealth$357kInternational$225kFood & Nutrition$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $228k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $750k
$12,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC$200,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$150,000
LUIS PALAU ASSOCIATION$125,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$100,000
D O O R INTERNATIONAL$75,250
SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDRENS HOME INC$25,000
FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR$25,000
PAZ DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
AMAZIMA MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION AND EMP$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$21,000
DESERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC$20,000
ASPIRE CHURCH$15,000
FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$12,000
EARN TO LEARN$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $469k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $13k → 15%FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%EARN TO LEARN: $10k → 15%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDRENS HOME INC: $25k → 11%4FREEDOM INC: $100k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $105 → 15%BREAKDOWN INTERNATIONAL INC: $50k → 15%BREAKDOWN INTERNATIONAL INC: $5k → 15%4FREEDOM INC: $125k → 15%4FREEDOM INC: $68k → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 15%4FREEDOM INC: $40k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
OR
NV
OH
CT
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 23 repeat orgs$459k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
30

Total granted

$19M
$314k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+27%

Still filing today

74%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    Desert Christian Schools Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $17M · revenue +48% · 64% of their budget
  • LP
    Luis Palau Association
    3× · 2022–2024 · $425k · revenue +19%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $232k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • HO
    Hands Of Hope Tucsongraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue +26%
  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $26k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Seminary Inc

Phoenix seminary's mission is to train men and women for christ-centered ministry for the building of healthy churches in phoenix and the world.

Education
2
Christian Ministries International
—
3
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
6
TaylorGlobalConsult

Mission consult and support

Religion
7
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
8
Mission Acts Ministries

Work with churches in usa mex

Unclassified
9
Inter-America Mission
—
10
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
11
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Arizona Inc

To evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, to disciple them in the Word of God, and to enfold them and their families in the local church for Christian living whenever possible.

—
12
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunshine Acres Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Interdenominational Ministerial Allliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%5%<5yr17%8%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr10%18%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr10%85%35–55yr12%2%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/49
the rest of the field
16%
4,464/28,436

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
24/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Desert Christian Schools Inc — $17,349,052 · OtherDesert Christian Schools Inc+30 more — $503,855 · OtherNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $1,650,000 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRI…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $100,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…Luis Palau Association — $425,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc — $139,144 · ReligionKIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · Religion+5 more — $46,000 · Religion4FREEDOM INC — $333,380 · Human ServicesFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES — $77,600 · Human ServicesBreakdown International — $55,260 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR — $25,000 · Human Services+3 more — $20,105 · Human ServicesUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $232,000 · EducationIdaho State University Foundation Inc — $75,000 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $10,000 · EducationCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $104,000 · HealthREDSIDE FOUNDATION — $90,565 · HealthHands Of Hope Tucson — $60,000 · HealthBOBBY JONES CHIARI & SYRINGOMYELIA FOUNDATION — $44,500 · HealthTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $28,000 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthHANDS OFFERING HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · InternationalAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East — $25,000 · InternationalAMAZON MISSION FOUNDATION INC — $9,500 · International+1 more — $1,800 · International
Other$17,852,907Philanthropy$1,750,000Religion$635,144Human Services$536,345Education$367,000Health$337,065International$81,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDesert Christian Schools Inc — $17,349,052 over 4y, 64% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $1,650,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLuis Palau Association — $425,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budget4FREEDOM INC — $333,380 over 4y, 31% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $232,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc — $139,144 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $104,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREDSIDE FOUNDATION — $90,565 over 8y, 18% of budgetFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES — $77,600 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetIdaho State University Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBreakdown International — $55,260 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS OFFERING HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetBOBBY JONES CHIARI & SYRINGOMYELIA FOUNDATION — $44,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $28,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPaz De Cristo Community Center — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHILDRENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $20,000 over 2y, 82% of budgetJ17 MINISTRIES INC — $19,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD — $13,363 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINTERDENOMINATIONAL MINISTERIAL ALLLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE THE SOLUTION DBA EARN TO LEARN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTucson Wildlife Center Inc — $9,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budget4 TUCSON INC — $6,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRomans 12 Ministries Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCITY PSALMS — $5,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetPUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND FOR HAITI INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRAVAH MINISTRIES — $1,200 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC — $600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGAP MINISTRIES — $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Hs Lopez Family F…Arizona Community Fou…Mark and Karen Luebke…Connie Hillman Family…United Way of Tucson …The Intuit FoundationThe Roy H Rogers Foun…Ashton Family Foundat…Jewish Community Foun…The Diane and Bruce H…Servant Foundation
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ26.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Mark and Karen Luebke Foundation Inc · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Intuit Foundation · The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust · Ashton Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Servant Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Abba's Storehouse Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines