Skip to content
Mankwitz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mankwitz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$55kReligion$11kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$6kYouth Development$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GI RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,200
JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$500
NORTH SHORE AUXILIARY OF JCFS$500
TEMPLE EMANUEL$400
MARSHA ALPERT MEMORIAL FUND$200
FACE FOUNDATION$100
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEARTS & HANDS: $1k → 13%HOSPICE OF DAYTON: $50 → 14%MATRICULATE: $200 → 17%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $100 → 8%DENVER HOSPICE: $400 → 12%DENVER HOSPICE: $100 → 12%DENVER HOSPICE: $100 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $100 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $75 → 12%THE DENVER HOSPICE: $150 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
CT
CA
CO
KS
TN
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
42

Total granted

$88k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+89%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DEL MAR FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +107%
  • GC
    GRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • JL
    JEWISH LINKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +471%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
9
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
12
American Academy of Dermatology Inc

To assure that dermatologists have access to the highest quality education, research and innovations in the field, and that patients and the public have access to the highest quality medical and surgical dermatologic care and to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is Hearts and Hands Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
27/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FACE FOUNDATION: $44,600 · OtherFACE FOUNDATIONTEMPLE EMANUEL: $8,275 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING: $7,400 · OtherJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING+39 more: $17,130 · Other+39 moreGRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $3,500 · EducationGRALAND C…MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $3,500 · EducationMONARCH S…JEWISH LINKS INC: $1,000 · EducationJEWISH LI…DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $450 · EducationKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $450 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $3,625 · Human ServicesHEARTS AND HANDS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC: $750 · Human ServicesMATRICULATE INC: $200 · Human Services+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesDEL MAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementDEL MAR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $600 · Community ImprovementALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $900 · HealthNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $800 · HealthBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsWEDONTWASTE INC: $275 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$77,405Education$9,100Human Services$5,725Community Improvement$5,600Health$3,200Recreation & Sports$2,500Food & Nutrition$525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEL MAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $3,625 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH LINKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHEARTS AND HANDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Vision of Children: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEL MAR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATRICULATE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUE MILLER DAY OF CARING: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN TRUST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEL MAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds GRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LINKS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS AND HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Vision of Children ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WEDONTWASTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MATRICULATE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community Founda…Colorado Gives Founda…Amg Charitable Gift F…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
Rose Community FoundationCO15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mankwitz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mankwitz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mankwitz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home