Skip to content
Management Partners Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Management Partners Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$50kHealth$42kArts & Culture$36kEmployment$22kCommunity Improvement$15kHuman Services$8kInternational$6kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Association of Latino Healthcare$20,000
NAHSE$10,000
The CareSource Foundation$5,000
National Alliance for Care at Home$3,000
City of Hope$316
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement$100
Bluford Healthcare Leadership Institute$100
MD Anderson Cancer Center$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tides Family Services: $100 → 7%Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvan: $3k → 22%Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvan: $3k → 22%Welcoming Center New Pennsylvanians: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$170k · 14 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$170k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

64%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WHYY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +8%
  • FO
    FORUM OF EXECUTIVE WOMEN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +14%
  • WC
    WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • D
    DiverseForce
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Business Group On Health

To convene employers and health industry stakeholders to address the financing, delivery and affordability experience as they relate to health, well-being and workforce strategy issues.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baystate Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAHSE: $25,000 · OtherNAHSENational Association of Latino Healthcare: $20,000 · OtherNational Association of Latino HealthcareFORUM OF EXECUTIVE WOMEN: $15,000 · OtherFORUM OF EXECUTIVE WOMENEconomy League Greater Philadelphia: $10,000 · OtherEconomy League Greater PhiladelphiaHR Department of the Year Award: $6,548 · OtherHR Department of the Year AwardDiverseForce: $5,000 · OtherDiverseForce+13 more: $9,069 · Other+13 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPH…NATIONAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyWHYY INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INCThe CareSource Foundation: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,012 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthUniversity Health Foundation: $500 · Health+9 more: $1,507 · HealthWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $7,500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesGLOBAL PARTNERS IN CARE: $6,078 · InternationalUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$90,617Philanthropy$61,100Arts & Culture$35,000Health$9,019Human Services$7,600International$6,078Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHYY INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORUM OF EXECUTIVE WOMEN: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERS IN CARE: $6,078 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,012 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity Health Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Lukes Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTDANE: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FAMILY SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEND HEALTH STRATEGIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBronson Health Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Management Partners Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Management Partners Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Baystate Health Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Management Partners’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home