Skip to content
Maloy Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Maloy Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$341kYouth Development$51kEnvironment$51kHealth$39kRecreation & Sports$36kPhilanthropy$36kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $72k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMIT SCHOOL$39,700
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$31,800
ALL IN ONE FIGHT AGAINST CANCER$5,000
BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
KALEIDEUM MUSEUMS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CLAY SETZER FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%Michael Phelps Foundation: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
DE
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$471k · 16 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
41

Total granted

$471k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+5%

Still filing today

50%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Summit School Incorporated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $173k · revenue +32%
  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +30%
  • TM
    THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • DF
    DEKE Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • JB
    Jordan Buyer Scholarship Fund Wake Forest University
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robin Hood Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
13/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Summit School Incorporated: $172,633 · EducationThe Summit School IncorporatedWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $140,090 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY+2 more: $15,000 · EducationBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SERVICES INC: $50,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SER…DEKE Foundation: $10,000 · OtherDEKE FoundationJordan Buyer Scholarship Fund Wake Forest University: $10,000 · OtherJordan Buyer Scholarship Fun…Barclay L Setzer Fund co WS Foundation: $7,500 · OtherALL IN ONE FIGHT AGAINST CANCER: $7,000 · OtherWAKE FOREST BASEBALL EXCEL: $6,800 · OtherWake Forest Baptist Medical Center: $6,000 · OtherRV4CampFire: $5,000 · OtherNovant Health Forsyth MedicalCenter Foundation: $5,000 · Other+31 more: $37,695 · Other+31 morePIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $51,000 · EnvironmentPIEDMONT L…THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $5,610 · HealthMICHAELS MISSION INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $2,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $750 · Health+5 more: $1,606 · HealthREYNOLDA HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKALEIDEUM: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCHRIS PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · Youth Development
Education$327,723Other$144,995Environment$51,000Human Services$20,000Health$16,966Arts & Culture$7,500Youth Development$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Summit School Incorporated: $172,633 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $140,090 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $51,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $5,610 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREYNOLDA HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHAELS MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRSPA SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHRIS PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEmergencyRV Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAISLING IRISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $544 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Summit School Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds REYNOLDA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHAELS MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds RSPA SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KALEIDEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN FORSYTH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIS PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EmergencyRV Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winston-Salem Fou…Ta John W and Anna H …Reynolds Foundation 1…Reynolds American Fou…Duke Energy FoundationThe Bank of America C…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …
The Winston-Salem FoundationNC19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · Ta John W and Anna H Hanes Foundation · Reynolds Foundation 186-8803582 · Reynolds American Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maloy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maloy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maloy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home