Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford

Organization's primary exempt purpose the specific and primary purposes of LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD ("lpch") are to support, benefit and further the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of the board of trustees of the leland stanford junior university ("stanford university"), including its school…

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$5.0MFood & Nutrition$720kArts & Culture$656kHuman Services$615kYouth Development$542kCrime & Legal$465kEducation$141kPhilanthropy$93kOther$1.8M
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $1,679,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,987,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $308,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$250,000
RAVENSWOOD FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$250,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES BAY AREA$125,000
PUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR$100,000
LIFEMOVES$100,000
SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE$100,000
SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$100,000
ADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES$100,000
MARCH OF DIMES$100,000
SONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC$75,000
FRESH APPROACH$75,000
SHINE TOGETHER INC$75,000
ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$75,000
MY DIGITAL TAT2 INC$54,000
ACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $615k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNITED WAY OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $40k → 13%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $110k → 8%TALK READ SING: $70k → 7%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $85k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $35k → 8%CRUZMED FOUNDATION INC: $65k → 13%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $100k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $100k → 8%ABILITIES UNITED: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.8M · 25 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$9.8M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+35%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +115%
  • SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $685k · revenue +126%
  • PD
    PUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR
    8× · 2017–2024 · $656k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • F5
    First 5 Association of California Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue -4%
  • PF
    PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY CENTRAL COASTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $65k · revenue +58%
  • JV
    JOINT VENTURE SILICON VALLEY NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
2
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
5
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
6
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Chac Fka Community Health Awareness Council

Chac seeks to improve lives and strengthen communities through access to comprehensive and culturally responsive mental health services in northern santa clara county.

Health
10
Aliados Health

See schedule o.aliados health is a regional association of 17 community health centers with sites in marin, napa, sonoma, contra costa, solano, and yolo counties. the organization was formed in 1994. our mission is to improve access to,…

Health
11
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
12
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Cruz Community Health Centers and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%41%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr11%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%55%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr11%15%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
12%
3,028/26,061

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center — $2,495,000 · HealthSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood …SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $685,000 · HealthSANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES — $505,000 · HealthADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICESMARCH OF DIMES INC — $288,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC — $280,000 · HealthSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INCROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $250,000 · HealthACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $230,000 · Health+7 more — $257,500 · HealthSAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE — $910,000 · OtherSAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIF…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA — $245,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE C…My Digital TAT2 Inc — $234,000 · OtherMy Digital TAT2 IncMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $212,500 · OtherMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALT…LIFEMOVES — $200,000 · OtherLIFEMOVESChallenge Success — $100,000 · OtherUnited Way of Santa Cruz County — $92,500 · Other+4 more — $65,220 · OtherFRESH APPROACH — $370,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $350,000 · Food & NutritionPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $656,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $270,000 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE — $200,000 · Human ServicesFirst 5 Association of California Inc — $70,000 · Human ServicesPHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY CENTRAL COAST — $65,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesSHINE TOGETHER INC — $402,250 · Youth DevelopmentPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County — $465,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$4,990,500Other$2,059,220Food & Nutrition$720,000Arts & Culture$656,000Human Services$615,000Youth Development$542,250Crime & Legal$465,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center — $2,495,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetSANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $685,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $656,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES — $505,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County — $465,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSHINE TOGETHER INC — $402,250 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetFRESH APPROACH — $370,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $350,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $288,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC — $280,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $270,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $250,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA — $245,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMy Digital TAT2 Inc — $234,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $230,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $212,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $140,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetJACOBS HEART CHILDRENS CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES — $125,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetChallenge Success — $100,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUnited Way of Santa Cruz County — $92,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $60,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $32,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOINT VENTURE SILICON VALLEY NETWORK — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $16,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILITYPATH HOUSING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHealthImpact — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMBER SAN MATEO COUNTY — $8,720 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Silicon Valley Commun…Sunlight GivingThe David and Lucile …Sutter Bay HospitalsThe Sobrato Family Fo…East Bay Community Fo…Sand Hill FoundationAtkinson FoundationPhilanthropic Venture…Gordon E and Betty I …Tides Foundation
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA34.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · The Sobrato Family Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Tides Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines