· Private foundation
Loeb Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $231k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE BETH OR | $27,010 |
| HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| RIVER REGION UNITED WAY | $20,000 |
| ALLIANCE THEATRE COMPANY | $17,000 |
| HIGH MUSEUM OF ART | $17,000 |
| TEMPLE SINAI | $16,000 |
| FAMILY SUNSHINE CENTER | $16,000 |
| TEMPLE ISAIAH | $15,000 |
| READY TO SUCCEED | $15,000 |
| DIDI HIRSCH | $15,000 |
| COLLINS & KRATZ FAMILY YMCA | $12,000 |
| LANDMARKS FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| TULANE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| MONTGOMERY PRIDE UNITED | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
121 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 80 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RWROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +51%
- ASALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +19%
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- MOMONTGOMERY OAK PARK GARDENSone grant, 2021 · $13k
- AUAUBURN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $10k
- ASAtlanta Speech School Incone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is The Dillon Henry Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER REGION UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY PRIDE UNITED ↗
- Who funds CAPRI COMMUNITY FILM SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST STAR INC ↗
- Who funds The Everychild Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Big Sunday ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGDON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gordy-Mead-Britton Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Samuel L Schloss Family Foundation Tr Schlossburke K Trustee · B Stephen Schloss Foundation · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc · Crum Family Charitable Foundation · The Hobbs Foundation · The J K Lowder Family Foundation · John and Joyce Caddell Foundation · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · We3 Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Loeb Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.