Skip to content

· Private foundation

Live Oak Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$301k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.5MFood & Nutrition$541kReligion$297kCivil Rights$207kYouth Development$189kRecreation & Sports$180kEducation$159kArts & Culture$102kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $123k
$14,601
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$123,000
COMMUNITY CARING CENTER$38,659
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF FT WORT$24,000
AZLE LIONS CLUB$18,346
GOOD NEWS 4 SENIORS$16,972
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,601
THE AZLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,818
THE WOMEN'S CENTER$10,000
AZLE ISD$9,978
VARIOUS CASH CONTRIBUTIONS TO 501(C)(3)$6,650
GUNNSION TOUGH$5,000
ACADEMY 4$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Safe Harbor Counseling Center: $17k → 8%Safe Harbor Counseling Center: $5k → 8%Safe Harbor Counseling Center: $2k → 8%Double Eagle Charities Inc: $14k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 20 repeat orgs$333k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$3.1M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+97%

Still filing today

35%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +88%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +53%
  • AE
    AZLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • AC
    ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +116%
  • CB
    Crested Butte Tough Enough to Wear
    one grant, 2023 · $49k
  • FW
    Fort Worth Botanic Garden
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Advocacy Center of Van Zandt County Inc

The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.

Human Services
2
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
3
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation of Abilene

To empower people to make a lasting charitable impact on our community. we connect donors to causes they care about, manage strategic investments to preserve our endowments, make grants that align with donor intent, respond to community…

Philanthropy
5
Coastal Bend Community Foundation

To enhance the quality of life in the coastal bend area of texas through charitable and educational grants.

Philanthropy
6
Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc

Children's advocacy centers of texas, inc. (cactx) is the statewide organization for its 70 children's advocacy centers (cac's) across texas. cactx leads efforts, in partnership with investigatory and prosecution agencies, to pursue…

Crime & Legal
7
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
8
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
9
Texas State University Development Foundation

To support and further the mission of texas state university through the acceptance and investment of gifts established as endowments benefiting the students, faculty and staff.

Education
10
Central Texas 4C Inc

"we are committed to building stronger central texas communities, one child and family at a time" early head start program ages 0-3. head start program ages 3-5.

Human Services
11
Four County Comprehensive Mental Health Center Inc

Dedicated to holistic care given with compassion, respect, acceptance and hope. achieving emotional well being and independence.

Health
12
Amarillo Area Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Amarillo area casa advocates for abused and neglected children through support and training of court appointed volunteers

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley; the most unlike its peers is Azle Library Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Caring Center: $1,542,189 · OtherCommunity Caring CenterGood News 4 Seniors: $241,952 · OtherGood News 4 SeniorsFirst United Methodist Church of Ft: $236,500 · OtherFirst United Methodist Church of FtAZLE LIONS CLUB: $182,204 · OtherAZLE LIONS CLUBTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $123,000 · OtherACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100,000 · Other+17 more: $502,666 · Other+17 moreALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $207,184 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $102,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $71,000 · HealthGUNNISON TOUGH: $5,000 · HealthAZLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $49,758 · EducationSAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER INC: $24,028 · Human ServicesDOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC: $14,250 · Human ServicesTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $31,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$2,928,511Civil Rights$207,184Arts & Culture$102,000Health$76,000Education$49,758Human Services$38,278Membership Benefit$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $207,184 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $71,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAZLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $49,758 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $31,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER INC: $24,028 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetDOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC: $14,250 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAZLE LIBRARY TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds AZLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GUNNISON TOUGH ↗
  • Who funds AZLE LIBRARY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE GUNNISON VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · R4 Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Live Oak Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Live Oak Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Live Oak’s filings →

    More from the funding graph