Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lifestance Health Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$602kEducation$37kRecreation & Sports$35kEnvironment$16kHuman Services$14kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEADS INC: $450 → 11%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $550 → 17%ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $450 → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $450 → 8%HILLSIDES: $450 → 14%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NON-VIOLENCE (SPAN): $450 → 12%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $450 → 14%FAMILIES FOR FAMILIES: $450 → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $450 → 7%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $550 → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $450 → 17%WALK WITH SALLY: $450 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265k · 4 repeat orgs$466k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
135

Total granted

$265k
$466k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsCivil RightsRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +15%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • AC
    A Christian Ministry in the National Parks
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • MH
    Mental Health Coalition Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +26%
  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +181%
  • HS
    Hillsboro Schools Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $36k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

2
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

3
Anuvia Prevention and Recovery Center Inc

We Restore, We Empower, We rise together.

4
Rise Above the Disorder

Rise Above The Disorder is a non-profit centered on making mental health care accessible and affordable to everyone. Our cause was founded in 2012 as a team of volunteers helping people find local therapists and crowd-funding the cost of…

Health
5
Inseparable Inc

Inseparable Inc is focused on creating a world where mental health is treated as a critical and equal piece of overall health, and where systems are designed with their impact on mental health in mind. Inseparable, Inc. is a growing…

Health
6
Mentis

Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.

Human Services
7
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
8
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

9
Haven Inc

To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence

Crime & Legal
10
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
11
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
12
Trivium Life Services

Behavioral health, long-term support services, mental health therapy, substance, alcohol and drug abuse treatment as well as domestic violence offender intervention services

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Mom Hugs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Christian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…Local History MuseumsLgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterSchool District FoundationsAddiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr19%27%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%43%10–20yr19%10%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/115
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,645

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
106/108
Grantees still filing
59/108
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $259,900 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTIONNAMI National — $40,000 · HealthNAMI National+22 more — $10,500 · HealthMental Health Coalition Inc — $250,000 · PhilanthropyMental Health Coalition Inc+6 more — $2,900 · PhilanthropyHillsboro Schools Foundation — $35,811 · Education+1 more — $550 · EducationUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC — $3,300 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsWashington Recovery Alliance — $7,500 · Other+99 more — $49,050 · OtherPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $25,000 · Youth Development+2 more — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MOUNTAINEERS — $15,246 · Environment+2 more — $900 · Environment
Health$310,400Philanthropy$252,900Education$36,361Recreation & Sports$34,300Other$56,550Youth Development$26,000Environment$16,146

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $259,900 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMental Health Coalition Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNAMI National — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHillsboro Schools Foundation — $35,811 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MOUNTAINEERS — $15,246 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWashington Recovery Alliance — $7,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC — $3,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Christian Ministry in the National Parks — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HEAL HELP TO EAT ACCEPT & LIVE — $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ATLANTA WOMENS FOUNDATION INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Shelter of Northern KY Inc — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROICE-HURST HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAROL MILGARD BREAST CENTER — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WISH PROJECT — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA HILL FOUNDATION — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE MOM HUGS INC — $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildrens Advocacy Center - Hope House — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITYWORX FKA PTA THRIFT SHOP INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFURRR FELINE RESCUE — $550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTROS SOR ISOLINA FERRE INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORMATION PROJECT — $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST RESPONDER THERAPY DOGS — $550 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIKE FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC — $550 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITANS INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT 360 — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EDUCATION ALLIANCE FOR BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS INC — $450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN OHIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATION — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDES — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA13.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Carmax Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · American Express Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Petco Love · Grapevine giving foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Truist Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lifestance Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Samaritans Inc31% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • Families for Families2% of income from government
  • Neads Inc1% of income from government
  • Bayada Home Health Care Inc1% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Delaware Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lifestance Health Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lifestance Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph