· Private foundation
Leonard C & Mildred F Ferguson Foundation
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k31 grants · $139k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $523k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $423k
- $250k+3 grants · $6.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Ferguson Foundation | $4,836,562 |
| Conservancy of SW Florida | $1,000,000 |
| Highland Community College | $317,500 |
| Wilderness Center | $118,000 |
| Project Drawdown | $100,000 |
| Maine Environmental Education Association | $100,000 |
| Give Direct | $55,000 |
| Shelburne Farms | $50,000 |
| Eastside College Preparatory | $48,000 |
| Peninsula Open Space Trust | $30,000 |
| Peninsula Bridge | $30,000 |
| Massillon Family YMCA | $27,000 |
| University of Maine | $25,000 |
| University of Vermont Medical Center | $25,000 |
| Second Harvest Food Bank of Silicon Valley | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–26, $271k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 32% of Leonard C & Mildred F Ferguson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 38% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 5% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
109 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2026, 61 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA8× · 2017–2026 · $1.4M · revenue +561%- MEMAINE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION6× · 2021–2026 · $636k · revenue +20%
SHELBURNE FARMS9× · 2018–2026 · $425k · revenue +257%
Funded once
- FOFoundation of Collier Countyone grant, 2020 · $250k
- URUKRAINE RELIEFone grant, 2023 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.
To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.
Our Mission is to educate and advocate for the sustainable use of the forest and the ecological, economic, and social health of Maines forest community
To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.
The mission of the 30 Mile River Watershed Association (30 Mile) is to work as a community for clean and healthy lakes, ponds and streams in our watershed. Since 2008, 30 Mile has led efforts to protect these waters from the growing…
Cei integrates financing, small business and industry expertise, and policy solutions to grow a vibrant future for people and communities in maine and rural regions.
The Eastern Maine Conservation Initiative (EMCI) is a non-profit organization with broad conservation interests that seeks to: 1) Foster environmentally sustainable communities of the eastern Maine coast; 2) Encourage an appreciation of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ferguson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 43% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
145 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 145 of the 226 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Ferguson Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds MAINE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
- Who funds FREDERIC REMINGTON ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILDERNESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRESH APPROACH ↗
- Who funds LIVE EARTH FARM DISCOVERY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND ISLANDS LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Development Foundation ↗
- Who funds PIE RANCH ↗
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEA CHANGE YOGA ↗
- Who funds GROWSMART MAINE ↗
- Who funds THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds APEX YOUTH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds ISLESFORD BOATWORKS ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds TREKKERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Onion Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Horizon Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Quimby Family Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Davis Conservation Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leonard C & Mildred F Ferguson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northern Forest Canoe Trail Inc — 4% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.