Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leatherwood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$324kHealth$191kEducation$122kHousing & Shelter$105kArts & Culture$93kAnimals$75kEnvironment$57kHuman Services$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
20 MOVES DONOR ADVISED FUND$86,567
LEATHERWOOD FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND$86,566
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT$5,000
NORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$3,000
ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$2,000
WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION$1,000
DISCALCED INC$1,000
MARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL FUND$1,000
LI FRAUMENI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$1,000
CONSERVATION FLORIDA INC$1,000
COLORADO OPEN LANDS$500
MESA VERDE FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHARING & CARING: $2k → 8%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $1k → 5%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $6k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $6k → 8%SHARING & CARING: $500 → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $2k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $1k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $1k → 7%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICK: $1k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $5k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $5k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $5k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER: $8k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER: $5k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
NM
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$899k · 56 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
30

Total granted

$899k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+32%

Still filing today

66%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $43k · revenue +95%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +32%
  • MV
    MESA VERDE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • CC
    CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SULLI
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
3
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
6
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
7
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
10
Mountain Area Land Trust

Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.

Environment
11
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is Mesa Verde Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
39/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED FUND: $145,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISED FUND20 MOVES DONOR ADVISED FUND: $86,567 · Other20 MOVES DONOR ADVISED FUNDLEATHERWOOD FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND: $86,566 · OtherLEATHERWOOD FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUNDMARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL FUND: $43,000 · OtherMARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL FUNDDISCALCED INC: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · Other+50 more: $294,020 · Other+50 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $43,000 · HealthDana-Farber Can…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $32,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN …HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER…Li Fraumeni Syndrome Association Inc: $24,000 · HealthLi Fraumeni Syn…CASTING FOR RECOVERY: $14,000 · HealthCASTING FOR REC…COMEBACK YOGA: $9,000 · HealthCOMEBACK YOGA+2 more: $8,000 · HealthTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $34,000 · Arts & CultureMESA VERDE FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCURRAN EVENTS INC: $8,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $24,800 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $22,500 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $21,500 · AnimalsALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $4,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $4,000 · Human ServicesSHELTER HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSHARING & CARING INC: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $22,037 · EnvironmentAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST: $10,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION FLORIDA INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentBAY COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentROCKING THE BOAT INC: $25,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Education
Other$706,653Health$155,000Arts & Culture$81,500Animals$73,800Human Services$63,500Environment$40,037Education$33,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $43,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $34,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMESA VERDE FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetROCKING THE BOAT INC: $25,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $24,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLi Fraumeni Syndrome Association Inc: $24,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $22,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $22,037 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $18,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $14,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMEBACK YOGA: $9,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCURRAN EVENTS INC: $8,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DELORES PROJECT: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLDWOMENWORK: $6,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION FLORIDA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OKALOOSA COUNTY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDOCTORS CARE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR MILE HISTORIC PARK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING & CARING INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALM ORGANIZATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSea Turtle Conservancy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds MESA VERDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKING THE BOAT INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Li Fraumeni Syndrome Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds COMEBACK YOGA ↗
  • Who funds CURRAN EVENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO25.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Anschutz Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · Anschutz Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leatherwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leatherwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leatherwood’s filings →

More from the funding graph