Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawrence & Alice Valenstein Family Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$144kCivil Rights$47kEducation$32kHealth$28kAnimals$28kArts & Culture$26kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$206k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$3,000
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD$2,500
JUDICIAL WATCH$2,500
FRIENDS OF THE GOVERNOR'S MANSION$2,500
HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION$2,500
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$2,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,500
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$1,500
AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,500
STARK MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$1,200
FRIENDS OF PATHWAYS$1,000
TETON COUNTRY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
NY
MA
WY
CT
CA
UT
WV
VA
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$393k · 39 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
18

Total granted

$393k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+31%

Still filing today

72%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +82%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +41%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2017–2023 · $26k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • LB
    LAURA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR AMERICA'S LIBRARIES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • B
    BREAKTHROUGHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +159%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment
3
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
4
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.

Environment
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
9
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
10
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
11
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
12
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/45
Grantees still filing
35/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARTHJUSTICE: $52,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICENATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $26,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATE…Montana Environmental Information Center: $10,500 · EnvironmentMontana Environmental Information Cent…STARK MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC: $9,700 · EnvironmentSTARK MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INCSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $6,500 · Environment+4 more: $4,160 · EnvironmentPursuit Of Excellence: $17,500 · OtherPursuit Of ExcellenceAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $14,500 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF N…THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $9,000 · OtherOAK HILL FIRE FOUNDATION: $6,650 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $6,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $17,500 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $13,500 · OtherAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INCJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $13,500 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INCTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $9,500 · OtherTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC+31 more: $66,900 · Other+31 moreHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $25,180 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $22,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $10,650 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE GOVERNOR'S MANSION: $9,900 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $650 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $12,250 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $4,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $18,000 · Food & Nutrition
Environment$143,860Other$174,550Health$28,180Civil Rights$22,000Arts & Culture$21,200Philanthropy$20,750Food & Nutrition$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $52,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $25,180 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $17,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPursuit Of Excellence: $17,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $12,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $10,650 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMontana Environmental Information Center: $10,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GOVERNOR'S MANSION: $9,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSTARK MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC: $9,700 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTeton County Search & Rescue Foundation: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PATHWAYS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeton County Library Foundation & Friends: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTexas Book Festival: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTETON RAPTOR CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSheriff's Memorial & Benevolent Society of Travis County: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN FINGERS GARDEN CLUB INC: $160 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSYMPHONY OF SOUL: $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Pursuit Of Excellence ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds Montana Environmental Information Center ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GOVERNOR'S MANSION ↗
  • Who funds STARK MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE J PAUL GETTY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Teton County Search & Rescue Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PATHWAYS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Brooks Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ac and Penney Hubbard Foundation Inc · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawrence & Alice Valenstein Family Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawrence & Alice Valenstein Family Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Madison Land Conservation Trust: 68% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lawrence & Alice Valenstein Family Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence & Alice Valenstein Family Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence & Alice Valenstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph