· Private foundation
Larry & Norma Price Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of LARRY & NORMA PRICE FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $197k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $23,300 |
| SOUTHERN OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH | $20,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $15,000 |
| GLOBAL PENDULUM | $15,000 |
| ACLU - AMERICAN CNETER FOR LAW & JUSTICE | $15,000 |
| CATHOLIC FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| LAUNCH GLOBAL | $15,000 |
| SOJOURNERS UNITED | $15,000 |
| EL PASO FOR JESUS | $13,000 |
| CHURCH AND SCHOOL OF ST CLEMENT | $10,725 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| ONNEMI INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ROOT INTERNATIONAL | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GPGLOBAL PENDULUM INC5× · 2021–2025 · $52k · revenue +25%
- OIONNEMI INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES4× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +20% · 26% of their budget
- RMRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +134%
Funded once
- RMRESCUE MINISTRIES OF MEXICO INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +6%
- EMEikon Ministries Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +85%
- LHLIVING HOPE BIBLE CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christain Home
Living hope international (lhi) is a faith-based organization with a three-fold mission. our goals are to: provide for underprivileged children and families by establishing orphanages, schools, and outreach programs throughout the world.…
Our mission is to build homes for poor families in tijuana mexico as well as to operate an orphanage called city of angels also in tijuana
Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…
We distribute food, clothing, and toiletry items to the poor and needy along the TX-Mexico Border as well as ministering to their spiritual needs through services, health programs, and other humanitarian efforts.
Baja bound ministries seeks to deliver the gospel through the construction of homes among the working poor and through creative and engaging ministry and food programs for the children in these communities.
Latin Equip's mission is to reach out to Latin America with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This is accomplished through pastoral and leadership training, establishment and constructions of churches, orphanages and similar outreaches,…
To demonstrate the love of Jesus by bringing spiritual guidance and physical relief to the people of Baja and the planting of Christ's church in communities in need of the Gospel.
Maintain and operate a home for needy and homeless children in mexico. development of programs and maintenance of home and churches in baja california mexico. also womens shelter for battered woman in rosarito. childrens home for needy…
Bringing the Good News of Jesus Christ to Latin America to help relieve the suffering of those in need. Teaching the Word of God and distributing Bibles Building churches and establishing Bible believing fellowships across Latin America
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Christian Childrens Home and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EL PASO FOR JESUS ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PENDULUM INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNERS UNITED ↗
- Who funds ONNEMI INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds EL PASO BAPTIST CLINIC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds CIUDAD NUEVA COMMUNITY OUTREACH IN ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds ARBOL DE VIDA ↗
- Who funds MANUELITO NAVAJO CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds ABARA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Children's Home ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MINISTRIES OF MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds CASAS POR CRISTO ↗
- Who funds LET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
- Who funds Eikon Ministries Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · The Lanward Foundation · The Stewart Family Charitable Foundation Marlene Stewart Trustee · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Paso del Norte Health Foundation · The Hunt Family Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larry & Norma Price Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Larry & Norma Price Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Larry & Norma Price Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.