· Private foundation
The Stewart Family Charitable Foundation Marlene Stewart Trustee
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $3k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $22,450 |
| YWCA | $1,000 |
| SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL | $1,000 |
| TWISTED PINK RIBBONS SISTERS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of The Stewart Family Charitable Foundation Marlene Stewart Trustee’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC5× · 2018–2023 · $138k · revenue +19%
- EPEL PASO PRO-MUSICA3× · 2018–2023 · $57k · revenue +14%
- PDPASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- EPEL PASO COUNTRY CLUBone grant, 2021 · $15k
- AAALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $9k
- GCGRANITE COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Ministry - spreading the word of Jesus
Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.
This organization wants to establish a solid foundation for life, and positively impact their schools and to teach and train through biblical principles.
Support the religious activities of the first presbyterian church of el paso.
Christian outreach ministry
Professional association of physicians.
Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.
With the bible as our foundation, and Classical Christian Education as our model, El Paso Christian School seeks to prepare students in wisdom, virtue, and service to glofify God.
El Buen Samaritano an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas serving the Latino community of Central Texas is committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that…
El paso symphony foundation is a separate corporation which provides the el paso symphony orchestra association with charitable and educational support.
With god's help, to reach spanish-speaking people throughout the world with the good news of salvation through the lord jesus christ and to disciple them for christian ministry.
The mission of hospice of el paso, inc. is to provide interdisciplinary care designed to meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of patients and their families who are coping with terminal illness and resulting losses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Pasoans for Life Inc and the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASO PRO-MUSICA ↗
- Who funds PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Channel 38 Christian Television ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds Lydia Patterson Institute ↗
- Who funds DELTA KILO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRANITE COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PENDULUM INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASO PRO MUSICA GUILD ↗
- Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVE LIFE BY MUSIC INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Twisted Pink Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Texas Cultural Trust Council ↗
- Who funds TOM LEA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO ↗
- Who funds El Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds EL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC ↗
- Who funds Glory Reborn Inc ↗
- Who funds EL PASO BAPTIST CLINIC ↗
- Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Paso del Norte Community Foundation · The Hunt Family Foundation · El Paso Community Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Feinberg Foundation · The Lanward Foundation · Larry & Norma Price Family Charitable Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation · Hervey Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stewart Family Charitable Foundation Marlene Stewart Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.