Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lainoff Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$587k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Human Services$522kHealth$518kEducation$421kArts & Culture$292kHousing & Shelter$228kFood & Nutrition$177kYouth Development$125kInternational$113kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $445k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGID ALLIANCE$60,000
RHODES COLLEGE$50,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$35,000
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE$30,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$30,000
SITAR ARTS CENTER$30,000
BRIGHT BEGINNINGS$30,000
ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC$25,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$20,000
INTERACT INTERNATIONAL$20,000
FEDERATION OF VIRGINIA FOOD BANKS$20,000
PATHWAYS TO HOUSING$20,000
GREATER DC DIAPER BANK$15,000
MANNA FOOD CENTER$15,000
DC PUBLIC LIBRARY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $602k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $25k → 9%KWEK SOCIETY CORP: $15k → 7%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $15k → 9%KWEK SOCIETY CORP: $10k → 7%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%KWEK SOCIETY CORP: $10k → 7%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE KWEK SOCIETY: $5k → 7%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $75k → 17%KWEK SOCIETY CORP: $5k → 7%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $62k → 17%JOSEPH'S HOUSE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION: $5k → 8%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $60k → 17%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $55k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $10k → 4%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $30k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $15k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $15k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $3k → 14%SMYAL: $5k → 14%SMYAL: $5k → 14%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING: $20k → 14%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING: $20k → 14%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING: $15k → 14%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING: $5k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $15k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $10k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $10k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $10k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $10k → 14%FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT & ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 50 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
26

Total granted

$2.2M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+27%

Still filing today

94%
96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $257k · revenue +544%
  • BB
    BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +103%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $110k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NW
    National Women's Health Network
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -11%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -62%
  • NV
    NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
2
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
5
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
6
Act for Alexandria

Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.

Community Improvement
7
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
8
Volunteer Legal Advocates

To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…

Housing & Shelter
9
Dc Affordable Law Firm

DC Affordable Law Firm delivers accessible justice to modest-income DC residents who do not qualify for traditional sources of free civil legal services and cannot afford standard representation. Our innovative programming expands access…

Human Services
10
Wonders Early Learning Extended Day

To create and advance high quality, diverse educational communities that teach children the foundations of life-long learning and social responsibility.

—
11
The Dc Central Kitchen Inc

We use food as a tool to strengthen bodies, empower minds, and build communities. dcck prepares people facing high barriers to employment for culinary careers, and creates jobs for our graduates through innovative programs that expand…

—
12
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Josephs House International Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community Organizati…Youth Sports ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportFood Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/80
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,485

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/80
Grantees still filing
49/80
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $257,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INCPATHWAYS TO HOUSING DC — $70,000 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS TO HOUSING DCMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $67,500 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHENGREATER DC DIAPER BANK — $55,000 · Human ServicesGREATER DC DIAPER BANKThe KWEK Society — $45,000 · Human ServicesThe KWEK SocietyMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION IN…HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT — $40,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTI…+4 more — $27,500 · Human ServicesBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $120,000 · OtherBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INCARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC — $70,000 · OtherARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INCDC SCORES — $65,000 · OtherDC SCORESIndividual grant recipient — $58,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCreate CA — $45,000 · OtherPROJECT CREATE ARTS CENTER — $32,500 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $60,000 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 · OtherLOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF INC — $42,000 · Other+35 more — $395,774 · Other+35 moreDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $260,000 · HealthDIABETES RESEARC…National Women's Health Network — $50,000 · HealthNational Women's…THE CATOCTIN FOUNDATION dba LOUDOUN FREE CLINIC — $30,000 · HealthTHE CATOCTIN FOU…INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthINOVA HEALTH SYS…+2 more — $12,500 · HealthSITAR ARTS CENTER — $145,000 · Arts & CultureSITAR ART…PLAZA DE LA RAZA INC — $35,000 · Arts & CulturePLAZA DE …INTERACT INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureINTERACT …THE INDEPENDENT SHAKESPEARE CO INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $18,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $110,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW ENDEAVORS BY WOMEN — $37,500 · Housing & ShelterTRANSITIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION — $17,500 · Housing & ShelterDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $73,000 · EducationRhodes College — $70,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS — $7,500 · Education+4 more — $13,500 · EducationMANNA FOOD CENTER INC — $45,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $40,000 · Food & NutritionTHRIVE DC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionDULLES SOUTH FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$602,000Other$928,774Health$372,500Arts & Culture$228,000Housing & Shelter$180,000Education$164,000Food & Nutrition$130,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $260,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $257,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSITAR ARTS CENTER — $145,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $110,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $73,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRhodes College — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING DC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $67,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDC SCORES — $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER DC DIAPER BANK — $55,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNational Women's Health Network — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe KWEK Society — $45,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCreate CA — $45,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF INC — $42,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT — $40,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNEW ENDEAVORS BY WOMEN — $37,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLAZA DE LA RAZA INC — $35,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CATOCTIN FOUNDATION dba LOUDOUN FREE CLINIC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJubilee Jumpstart — $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHORTON'S KIDS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRFAX COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC — $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHRIVE DC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFederation of Virginia Food Banks — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBest Kids Inc — $19,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTRANSITIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN LITERACY COUNCIL INC — $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUALITY LOUDOUN — $11,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetDULLES SOUTH FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT SHAKESPEARE CO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSMYAL Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDOUN CITIZENS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFihankra Akoma Ntoaso — $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Co…The Morris and Gwendo…United Way of the Nat…Philip L Graham Fund …Clark-Winchcole Found…Dimick Foundation Joh…Hattie M Strong Found…John Edward Fowler Me…World Bank Community …William S Abell Found…Eugene & Agnes E Meye…Nora Roberts Foundati…
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC57.3× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Hattie M Strong Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · World Bank Community Connections Fund · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lainoff Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lainoff Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lainoff Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines