Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kolitz Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$420kEducation$387kHealth$220kReligion$113kRecreation & Sports$78kPhilanthropy$70kYouth Development$31kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $137k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$31,750
SMITHSONIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF$30,000
MAGELLAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$25,000
FIRST TEE OF SAN ANTONIO$15,000
THRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION$15,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$10,244
THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONTEREY$10,000
DELL CHILDREN HOSPITAL WORMANS TRUS$3,500
CAMPUS OF JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DJCC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 20 repeat orgs$490k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
23

Total granted

$2.1M
$457k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

35%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MAGELLAN SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $327k · revenue +98%
  • TC
    THRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue +385%
  • CO
    CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $66k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $125k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $105k
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
4
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
5
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
6
The Campus of the San Antonio Jewish Community

To support and benefit the religious, charitable, and educational purposes of its nonprofit 501(c)(3) members.

Community Improvement
7
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
8
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
9
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
10
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
11
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

12
Junior Achievement of South Texas Inc

Junior achievement of south texas's mission is to inspire and prepare young peopleto succeed in a global economy. the purpose is to educate and inspire young peopleto value free enterprise, business, and economics to improve the quality of…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council and the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $828,916 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $125,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSMITHSONIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF — $120,000 · OtherSMITHSONIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OFIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE BETH EL — $100,299 · OtherFIRST TEE OF SAN ANTONIO — $78,000 · Other+25 more — $448,368 · Other+25 moreTHE MAGELLAN SCHOOL — $327,175 · EducationTHE MAGELLAN S…MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $76,000 · HealthTHRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION — $75,500 · Health+3 more — $4,350 · HealthCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL — $66,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCarmel Bach Festival Inc — $7,725 · Arts & CultureZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER — $5,000 · Arts & CultureVALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $25,000 · PhilanthropyBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County — $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $10,000 · Animals
Other$1,930,683Education$327,175Health$155,850Arts & Culture$108,725Philanthropy$50,000Youth Development$25,500Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MAGELLAN SCHOOL — $327,175 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $76,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION — $75,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL — $66,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County — $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCarmel Bach Festival Inc — $7,725 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXANS FOR SAFE AND DRUG-FREE YOUTH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MAGELLAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds VALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT)
  • Who funds DJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston
  • Who funds Carmel Bach Festival Inc
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Harris & Eliza Kempner Fund Inc · United Way Worldwide · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kolitz Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph