Skip to content

· Private foundation

King-Carpenter Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$478kHousing & Shelter$289kHuman Services$273kArts & Culture$249kEducation$211kFood & Nutrition$127kHealth$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNM FOUNDATION$2,030,000
MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM$80,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL NM$60,000
OPERA SOUTHWEST$35,000
HOPEWORKS$20,000
ALBUQUERQUE HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS$10,000
ALBUQUERQUE MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION NEW MEXICO$10,000
ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK$10,000
ARCA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CASA ESPERANZA INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION$5,000
NEW MEXICO CATHOLIC CHARITIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $80k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $25k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $10k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $10k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $10k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $9k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $8k → 14%MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $3k → 14%WESST: $13k → 14%CLN KIDS: $5k → 14%CLN KIDS: $5k → 14%WESST: $3k → 14%WESST: $3k → 14%WESST: $3k → 14%CLN KIDS: $3k → 14%CLN KIDS: $3k → 14%WESST: $3k → 14%WESST: $3k → 14%CIUDANDO LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%CLN KIDS: $3k → 14%CLN KIDS: $3k → 14%CLN KIDS: $3k → 14%ARCA: $10k → 14%ARCA: $5k → 14%ARCA: $5k → 14%ARCA: $5k → 14%ARCA: $5k → 14%ALL FAITHS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 14%ARCA: $5k → 14%ARCA: $5k → 14%ARCA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 30 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
12

Total granted

$3.6M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+26%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue +91%
  • OS
    Opera Southwest
    8× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +81%
  • RF
    ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SS
    SANDIA SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +19%
  • AA
    ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +32%
  • SA
    ST ANTHONY CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
New Mexico Acequia Association

To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.

Environment
3
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
4
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
5
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
6
The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico
—
7
Goodwill Industries of New Mexico

Goodwills mission is to provide skills training, job development and social services for new mexicans. goodwill's vision is that new mexicans will have the opportunity to improve their lives by utilizing goodwill's services and…

Employment
8
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
9
Adelante Development Center Inc

Adelante's mission is to support people with disabilities, disadvantages, and seniors as they discover and implement their personal goals in life. the agency has innovated and expanded to meet the needs and goals of people with…

Employment
10
University of New Mexico Alumni Association

The alumni association is a vital partner in the continued excellence of the university of new mexico through the significant engagement of alumni. the alumni association's mission is to serve as a bridge between alumni and the university…

Education
11
New Mexico Out-of School Time Network

To cultivate enriching experiences for children and youth beyond the school day. vision: all children and youth in new mexico have access to high quality out-of-school time (ost) opportunities regardless of zip code and income. the new…

Education
12
Presbyterian Healthcare Services

Presbyterian exists to ensure all of the patients, members and communities we serve can achieve their best health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Esperanza Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PNM TNMP FOUNDATION: $2,449,000 · OtherPNM TNMP FOUNDATIONHOPEWORKS: $173,619 · OtherHOPEWORKSUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL NM: $120,000 · Other+26 more: $361,000 · Other+26 moreUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO: $295,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $62,500 · PhilanthropyALBUQUERQ…+1 more: $7,000 · PhilanthropyMANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $153,500 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesARCA: $40,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP: $25,000 · Human ServicesCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesSANDIA SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $100,000 · EducationOpera Southwest: $114,000 · Arts & CultureALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $21,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels New Mexico: $47,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $28,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,103,619Philanthropy$364,500Human Services$291,500Education$200,000Arts & Culture$137,000Food & Nutrition$127,000Housing & Shelter$28,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPNM TNMP FOUNDATION: $2,449,000 over 8y, 31% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO: $295,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEWORKS: $173,619 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMANDY'S SPECIAL FARM: $153,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetOpera Southwest: $114,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSANDIA SCHOOL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCASA ESPERANZA INC: $60,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetMeals on Wheels New Mexico: $47,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $42,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetARCA: $40,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $28,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP: $25,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC: $25,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $21,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUPPER PECOS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $21,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE YOUTH SYMPHONY PROGRAM: $13,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO SYMPHONIC CHORUS: $7,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetDENTAL CARE IN YOUR HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetUNICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEROOTS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PNM TNMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM ↗
  • Who funds Opera Southwest ↗
  • Who funds SANDIA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA ESPERANZA INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels New Mexico ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCA ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP ↗
  • Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UPPER PECOS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE YOUTH SYMPHONY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds WORKING CLASSROOM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO SYMPHONIC CHORUS ↗
  • Who funds DENTAL CARE IN YOUR HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds UNICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM44.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · Club Culturale Italiano Inc · Hancock Family Foundation Inc · Arnia Foundation · JF Maddox Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization King-Carpenter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from King-Carpenter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on King-Carpenter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph