· Private foundation
King-Carpenter Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNM FOUNDATION | $2,030,000 |
| MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM | $80,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL NM | $60,000 |
| OPERA SOUTHWEST | $35,000 |
| HOPEWORKS | $20,000 |
| ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION NEW MEXICO | $10,000 |
| ALBUQUERQUE MEALS ON WHEELS | $10,000 |
| ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ALBUQUERQUE HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS | $10,000 |
| CASA ESPERANZA INC | $10,000 |
| ARCA | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| CLN KIDS | $5,000 |
| NEW MEXICO CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMANDY'S SPECIAL FARM8× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue +91%
- OSOpera Southwest8× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +81%
- RFROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- SSSANDIA SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +19%
- AAALBUQUERQUE ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +32%
- HCHAVERLAND CARTER NEIGHBORHOOD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.
Goodwills mission is to provide skills training, job development and social services for new mexicans. goodwill's vision is that new mexicans will have the opportunity to improve their lives by utilizing goodwill's services and…
The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.
Adelante's mission is to support people with disabilities, disadvantages, and seniors as they discover and implement their personal goals in life. the agency has innovated and expanded to meet the needs and goals of people with…
The alumni association is a vital partner in the continued excellence of the university of new mexico through the significant engagement of alumni. the alumni association's mission is to serve as a bridge between alumni and the university…
To cultivate enriching experiences for children and youth beyond the school day. vision: all children and youth in new mexico have access to high quality out-of-school time (ost) opportunities regardless of zip code and income. the new…
Presbyterian exists to ensure all of the patients, members and communities we serve can achieve their best health.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Esperanza Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PNM TNMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
- Who funds MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM ↗
- Who funds Opera Southwest ↗
- Who funds SANDIA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA ESPERANZA INC ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels New Mexico ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds ARCA ↗
- Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP ↗
- Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UPPER PECOS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE YOUTH SYMPHONY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds WORKING CLASSROOM INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO SYMPHONIC CHORUS ↗
- Who funds UNICA ↗
- Who funds DENTAL CARE IN YOUR HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · Club Culturale Italiano Inc · Hancock Family Foundation Inc · Arnia Foundation · JF Maddox Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization King-Carpenter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.