Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kesselman Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2026still arriving
46
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$209kHealth$63kHuman Services$45kReligion$38kArts & Culture$33kInternational$29kFood & Nutrition$26kRecreation & Sports$21kOther$0
02FY2026 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEROME KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHI$7,500
FERN KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP$7,500
JEROME KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHI$7,500
FERN KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP$7,500
FEEDING AMERICA$5,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$5,000
FEEDING AMERICA$5,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$5,000
THE ACTION CENTER$2,500
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY$2,500
CU FOUNDATION BOULDER FINANCIAL AID$2,500
THE FAMILY TREE$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,500
CU FOUNDATION BOULDER FINANCIAL AID$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ASIA INITIATIVES: $2k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE: $3k → 7%ASIA INITIATIVES: $2k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE: $3k → 7%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE: $3k → 7%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE: $2k → 7%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE: $1k → 7%Asia Initiatives: $1k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE: $1k → 7%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%Asia Initiatives: $1k → 17%ASIA INITIATIVES: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$606k · 55 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2026, 34 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
28

Total granted

$606k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+12%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    3× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +33%
  • JA
    JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER
    10× · 2017–2026 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $30k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • DD
    DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +271%
  • HS
    HUMAN SOCIETY OF PIKES PEAK
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
2
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
3
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Asia Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
32/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FERN KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP: $56,000 · OtherFERN KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIPJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $30,375 · OtherJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTERJEROME KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHI: $30,000 · OtherJEROME KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIJEROME KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLAR FD: $26,000 · OtherJEROME KESSELMAN ENDOWED SCHOLAR FDHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,375 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY FUND FOR: $14,450 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEF SHALOM: $14,100 · Other+57 more: $234,005 · Other+57 moreUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $42,800 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…COLORADO ACADEMY: $15,500 · EducationCOLORADO ACAD…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,250 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…DARING GIRLS: $5,250 · EducationDARING GIRLS+4 more: $9,000 · Education+4 moreROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $18,500 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $17,750 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,375 · Arts & CultureAsia Initiatives: $13,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INC: $11,825 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10,450 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $19,125 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $15,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionTREVOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,875 · Civil RightsGENEVA GLEN CAMP INC: $21,750 · Youth Development
Other$422,305Education$82,800Arts & Culture$40,625Human Services$36,275Food & Nutrition$35,125Civil Rights$31,875Youth Development$21,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $42,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $30,375 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA GLEN CAMP INC: $21,750 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $19,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $18,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $17,750 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY: $15,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAsia Initiatives: $13,500 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $11,825 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $11,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAFS-USA INC: $7,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $6,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARING GIRLS: $5,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO KILL COLORADO: $2,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI COLORADO: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBANY AUTISM SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA GLEN CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds Asia Initiatives ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AFS-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds DARING GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kesselman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kesselman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kesselman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kesselman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kesselman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph