Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kathryne Beynon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$465k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.0MHuman Services$931kEducation$610kHealth$520kRecreation & Sports$435kPhilanthropy$150kReligion$135kFood & Nutrition$113kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $323k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $143k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CAMARILLO$75,000
FIVE ACRES$67,500
GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND$40,000
THOUSAND OAKS GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION$37,500
UNIVERSITY CAMPS INC$25,000
PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
MCCALL LIBRARY FOUNDATION$25,000
LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK (DBA YOUTH EMERGING STRONGER)$20,000
UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE$20,000
CASA PACIFICA CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$18,750
CONEJO COMMUNITY OUTREACH$18,000
CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT$17,500
CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR OUR SAVIOUR CENTER$17,500
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$17,500
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $468k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $30k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $30k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $25k → 14%SHEPHERD'S HOME INC: $10k → 8%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $23k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $20k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%CASA PACIFICA CENTERS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $5k → 14%FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN: $20k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN: $18k → 14%CASA PACIFICA CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $19k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $18k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $50k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $50k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $43k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $13k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $27k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 23 repeat orgs$463k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$3.6M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+22%

Still filing today

61%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $234k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $628k · revenue +3%
  • FA
    Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $518k · revenue +25%
  • CO
    Children of the Night
    9× · 2017–2025 · $162k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CC
    CRESPI CARMELITE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • PUBLIC COUNSELgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +70%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coachella Valley Foster Kids

In 2019 the juvenile dependency attorneys in indio formed coachella valley foster kids. we represent on average 1200 to 1500 youths in the foster system. these kids have either been permanently removed from their parents, or are in the…

Youth Development
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
4
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
5
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
6
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
7
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
8
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
9
United Friends of the Children

United friends of the children empowers current and former foster youth on their journey to self-sufficiency through service-enriched education and housing programs, advocacy and consistent relationships with a community of people who care.

Human Services
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc

CASA recruits, trains, and supports community volunteers who advocate for chidren and youth throughout their journey in foster care.

Crime & Legal
12
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
15/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLO: $627,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLOFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $517,500 · OtherFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles CountyCASA PACIFICA CTRS FOR CHILDREN FAM: $321,250 · OtherCASA PACIFICA CTRS FOR CHILDREN FAMUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS: $309,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTSTHE RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRY OF THE CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR IN SAN: $135,000 · OtherCOUNTY OF LACHILDREN FAMILY SVCS DE: $118,000 · OtherMCCALL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $116,750 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $112,750 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA CLARITA: $106,000 · Other+18 more: $460,250 · Other+18 moreLos Angeles Youth Network: $190,500 · Human ServicesLos Angeles Youth …Children of the Night: $161,500 · Human ServicesChildren of the Ni…St Anne's Family Services: $155,000 · Human ServicesSt Anne's Family S…Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $68,750 · Human ServicesCasa Pacifica Cent…FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN: $37,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF FOSTER …ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationCALIFORNI…POMONA COLLEGE: $75,250 · EducationPOMONA CO…SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationSAN FRANC…THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $20,000 · EducationTHE UNIVE…CONEJO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationCONEJO SC…MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $120,000 · PhilanthropyPasadena Community Foundation: $30,000 · PhilanthropyPUBLIC COUNSEL: $50,000 · Crime & LegalConejo Valley Girls Softball Association DBA Thousand Oaks Girls Softball Assoc: $37,500 · Recreation & SportsCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,824,000Human Services$653,250Education$335,250Philanthropy$150,000Crime & Legal$50,000Recreation & Sports$37,500Civil Rights$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLO: $627,500 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $517,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLos Angeles Youth Network: $190,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetChildren of the Night: $161,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetSt Anne's Family Services: $155,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $120,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $112,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $75,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $68,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN: $37,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetConejo Valley Girls Softball Association DBA Thousand Oaks Girls Softball Assoc: $37,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONEJO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONEJO COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $18,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE MOORPARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUC PRESS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSHEPHERDS HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE MAYFLY PROJECT: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLO ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
  • Who funds Los Angeles Youth Network ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Conejo Valley Girls Softball Association DBA Thousand Oaks Girls Softball Assoc ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CAMPS ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CONEJO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONEJO COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds THE MOORPARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UC PRESS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA21.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation · Ventura County Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kathryne Beynon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kathryne Beynon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kathryne Beynon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kathryne Beynon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kathryne Beynon’s filings →

More from the funding graph