Skip to content

· Public charity

Kanakuk Ministries

1) To relieve poverty by providing food, clothing, medical supplies, and other basic needs to underprivileged or impoverished children; 2) To advance the Kingdom of God and promote Christian virtue in individuals by providing support for Christian evangelistic organization and programs; 3) To educate children and advance the Kingdom of…

$4.0M
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$211k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Youth Development$1.5MReligion$146kEnvironment$60kCrime & Legal$41kHuman Services$27kHousing & Shelter$20kHealth$16kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $532,073, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,999,759 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,467,686 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $371k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Urban St Louis K-Life$210,918
K-Life Denver$96,230
K-Life National$63,510
Kids Across America$37,350
Kanakuk Institute$34,045
K-Life of St Louis$15,900
K-Life of Conway$15,000
K-Life of Fayetteville$14,635
H2Ozarks$10,000
K-Life of Ft Worth$8,000
Distinctly His Ministries$7,500
K-Life North Dallas$7,085
K-Life of Tulsa$6,350
K-Life of Atlanta$5,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pulse Ministries: $20k → 11%K-Life North Dallas: $45k → 5%K-Life of Oklahoma City: $10k → 16%K-Life of Fayetteville: $15k → 14%K-Life of Conway: $30k → 15%K-Life of Orlando: $29k → 13%K-Life of Kansas City: $9k → 5%K-Life of St Louis: $37k → 11%H2Ozarks: $10k → 13%CAPE Foundation: $12k → 14%Urban St Louis K-Life: $211k → 21%K-Life of Atlanta: $15k → 13%K-Life Denver: $96k → 8%Family Talk: $10k → 9%Pulse Ministries: $20k → 11%K-Life of Highland Park: $56k → 14%K-Life of Conway: $15k → 15%K-Life of St Louis: $16k → 11%Ozarks Water Watch: $10k → 13%CAPE Foundation: $9k → 14%Urban St Louis K-Life: $141k → 21%K-Life Denver: $94k → 8%Family Talk: $10k → 9%K-Life North Dallas: $10k → 14%Ozarks Water Watch: $10k → 13%Urban St Louis K-Life: $17k → 21%K-Life Denver: $24k → 8%Ozarks Water Watch: $10k → 13%K-Life National: $124k → 14%Ozarks Water Watch: $10k → 13%Kids Across America: $108k → 14%Ozarks Water Watch: $10k → 13%K-Life National: $64k → 14%Kids Across America: $59k → 14%K-Life National: $42k → 14%Kids Across America: $39k → 14%Kids Across America: $37k → 14%Kids Across America: $36k → 14%Kanakuk Institute: $34k → 14%K-Life of Tri-Lakes: $25k → 14%Kanakuk Institute: $23k → 14%Elevate Branson: $20k → 14%Kids Across America: $14k → 14%Kanakuk Institute: $14k → 14%K-Life National: $10k → 14%Woodland Hills Family Church: $10k → 14%K-Life of Tri-Lakes: $10k → 14%Fellowship of Christian Athletes: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
OH
CO
MO
KS
AR
TN
OK
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $442k on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$435k · 98% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Support schools in Haiti, housing, land

Sub-Saharan Africa$7k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Support Rwandan children in poverty

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 17 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$1.7M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
-31%

Still filing today

41%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentReligionEducationCrime & LegalEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $294k · revenue +133%
  • KM
    K-LIFE MINISTRIES
    4× · 2020–2023 · $281k · revenue +28%
  • TK
    THE KANAKUK INSTITUTE
    3× · 2018–2023 · $71k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • KM
    K-LIFE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $29k
  • EB
    ELEVATE BRANSON
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -31%
  • WH
    WOODLAND HILLS FAMILY CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids Across America

Christian sports camp to teach biblical principles and life skills to urban youth and their mentors.

Religion
2
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
3
Youth Conference Ministries Inc

To develop youth servant leaders who will share the message of jesus christ with their peers.

Youth Development
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Kingdom Building Ministries

This mission of Forge is to expand Gods Kingdom by challenging people to fully devote their lives to God and equipping them to live lives of active ministry. Our goal is to set hearts on fire and lives on purpose.

—
6
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
7
Youth for Christ Usa Inc Grand Forks Area Youth for Christ

Grand forks area youth for christ reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to prayer…

—
8
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
9
Family Life Ministries Inc

Impacting lives through the message of hope through christ centered programs, activities, and services.

—
10
Kris Vallotton Ministries

Christian ministry

Religion
11
Youth for Christ Inc Fayetteville Area

Yfc reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
12
Precept

Engaging people in relationship with God through knowing His Word

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Kids Across America Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

K-LIFE MINISTRIES: $369,004 · OtherK-LIFE MINISTRIESKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION: $293,987 · OtherKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATIONK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $280,824 · OtherK-LIFE MINISTRIESK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $214,387 · OtherK-LIFE MINISTRIESK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $117,570 · OtherK-LIFE MINISTRIESK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $52,750 · Other+13 more: $238,647 · Other+13 moreTHE KANAKUK INSTITUTE: $71,065 · ReligionPULSE OUTREACH: $40,000 · ReligionDr James Dobson Family Institute: $20,000 · ReligionUPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $14,200 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $10,545 · Youth DevelopmentDISTINCTLY HIS MINISTRIES: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE BRANSON: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSports Catalyst Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE MARGIN OF CHANGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education
Other$1,567,169Religion$131,065Environment$60,000Youth Development$32,245Food & Nutrition$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION: $293,987 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $280,824 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE KANAKUK INSTITUTE: $71,065 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetPULSE OUTREACH: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDr James Dobson Family Institute: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELEVATE BRANSON: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $14,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,545 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSports Catalyst Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARGIN OF CHANGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDISTINCTLY HIS MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFaith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center: $6,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds K-LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE KANAKUK INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PULSE OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Dr James Dobson Family Institute ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE BRANSON ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Sports Catalyst Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MARGIN OF CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds DISTINCTLY HIS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Faith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kanakuk Ministries funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kanakuk Ministries. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kanakuk Ministries?

    Find your warmest path to Kanakuk Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kanakuk Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph