Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC

UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC (Missouri) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $944,049 to it, the largest being OZARKS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC ($533,178). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.5M
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$944k
Net assets
$3.0M
4/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 23%
01What it does

What Upper White River Basin Foundation Inc does

Mission

To promote water quality in the upper white river basin watershed thorough bi-state collaboration on research, public policy and action projects in arkansas and missouri

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The foundation supports projects to monitor & report on water quality in the upper white river basin region of arkansas and missouri, and the buffalo river watershed region in arkansas. These projects provide data and information on the state of the water quality and provides insight to the projected direction of water quality parameters. The foundation has worked with volunteer monitoring programs in both arkansas and missouri for field work and analysis of water quality. Volunteer monitoring programs in both arkansas and missouri partnerships include stream team programs in arkansas, lakes of missouri volunteer program, secchi day on beaver lake, streamsmart, and various other state agencies, ngos and governmental agencies.

    $15,000 spent$243,598 earned by the program
    1% of program spending
  2. As of december 1, 2020, the foundation entered into a grant agreement with the arkansas natural resources commission to establish a septic tank remediation program for continued protection of the upper white river/beaver reservoir watershed in arkansas. The foundation is to receive an amount up to 254,000 from the water development fund for the administration of a 1,000,000 construction grant from the clean water state revolving fund for a three-year project period. In 2023, this srf septic remediation project replaced or repaired 25 failing septic systems in the beaver reservoir watershed in northwest arkansas totaling 330,161.74 in project costs; of which 250,881.52 were grants to homeowners, and 79,280.22 were 0% interest loans to homeowners.

    $302,881 spentof which $250,881 as grants
    30% of program spending
  3. The foundation entered into a sub-grant agreement with the arkansas department of agriculture natural resources division to perform and complete a soil and water assessment tool (swat) model for the upper white river watershed in arkansas (huc 11010001). This project began 12/1/2021. The foundation sub-contracted with ftn associates, overseeing and reviewing modeling and reporting activities. The draft final swat model report was reviewed by the foundation and comments sent to ftn associates in december 2023. The project is expected to be completed early 2024. The objective of this project is to apply the swat model for the arkansas portion of the upper white river watershed so that the sub-watersheds (huc12s) that are partially or completely within arkansas can be ranked based on sediment and nutrient loads, which helps prioritize the sub-watersheds to assist in developing nonpoint source (nps) investment strategies that will have the greatest impact on water quality objectives. Model results from this project will be used as part of the watershed management plan development project.

    $3,445 spent
    0% of program spending
  4. On september 9, 2022, the foundation entered into a grant agreement with the arkansas natural resources commission to establish a septic tank remediation program for protection of the buffalo river watershed in arkansas. The foundation is to receive an amount up to 278,400 from the water development fund for the administration of a 1,000,000 construction grant from the clean water state revolving fund for a three-year project period. The program offers financial and technical assistance to homeowners in need of septic repair or replacement within the buffalo river watershed. Funding is a combination of grant and/or zero-interest loan based on household income. Up to 90% of the total project cost may be covered by the grant, which requires zero payback by the homeowner. In 2023, this srf septic remediation project replaced or repaired 8 failing septic systems in the buffalo river watershed totaling 139,481.00 in project costs; of which 125,532.90 were grants to homeowners, and 13,948.10 were 0% interest loans to homeowners. The foundation entered into an agreement with beaver water district to conduct preliminary research on the impact of septic systems on water quality in streams…

    $689,950 spentof which $124,803 as grants
    68% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,011,276.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($748k) Expenses 100 ($721k) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2018 Revenue 103 ($771k) Expenses 87 ($628k) Net assets 102 ($2.4M)2019 Revenue 89 ($670k) Expenses 77 ($558k) Net assets 107 ($2.5M)2020 Revenue 77 ($580k) Expenses 80 ($579k) Net assets 111 ($2.6M)2021 Revenue 88 ($656k) Expenses 86 ($621k) Net assets 113 ($2.7M)2022 Revenue 141 ($1.1M) Expenses 121 ($876k) Net assets 114 ($2.7M)2023 Revenue 185 ($1.4M) Expenses 168 ($1.2M) Net assets 125 ($3.0M)2024 Revenue 200 ($1.5M) Expenses 217 ($1.6M) Net assets 126 ($3.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (200)Expenses (217)Net assets (126)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $2.7M to $3.0M (+10%).

$2.4M
$2.6M
$2.7M
$2.7M
$2.7M
$2.7M
$3.0M
$3.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 43% · 2018 22% · 2019 4% · 2020 18% · 2021 21% · 2022 42% · 2023 62% · 2024 40%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

92% of UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$27k
’17
$142k
’18
$112k
’19
$976
’20
$34k
’21
$178k
’22
$172k
’23
−$67k
’24
5.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Rob Johns

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed11121212101099
Joined·+2+0+0+0+1+1+2
No longer listed·1002122
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $6k → $198k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Kanakuk Ministriesunclassified
$60k
funders
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
2
1

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC.

56%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 79% · 2019 74% · 2020 48% · 2021 71% · 2022 70% · 2023 76% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC's grant income comes from Missouri funders.

MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $350k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC is better cushioned than half of the 2,186 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−4% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

93%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Ozarks Environmental Services Inc · exempt
  • Ozarks Clean Water Company · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC?
UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC (Missouri) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $944,049 to it, the largest being OZARKS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC ($533,178). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $944,049 in grants to UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC?
OZARKS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC is the largest funder on record, with $533,178 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like UPPER WHITE RIVER BASIN FOUNDATION INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Upper White River Basin →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing