Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jw and Ida M Jameson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$745k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$2.0MHealth$1.2MYouth Development$758kReligion$625kPublic Benefit$585kHousing & Shelter$495kPhilanthropy$375kRecreation & Sports$360kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $568k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOOR OF HOPE$60,000
PASADENA CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
YOUNG LIFE$42,500
LA CANADA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$40,000
LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$35,000
LA CANADA HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS$35,000
AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$35,000
INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC$30,000
HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES$25,000
CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY$25,000
RM PYLES BOYS CAMP$25,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION - JW & IDA M JAMESON FUND$25,000
CITY BLESSING CHURCH$25,000
UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES$25,000
VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOOTHILL FAMILY: $5k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $15k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $15k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $15k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $15k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $10k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $10k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $10k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $30k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $25k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $25k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $25k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $20k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $20k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $20k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $20k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.6M · 64 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

64 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
14

Total granted

$6.6M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

64%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    6× · 2017–2023 · $350k · revenue +202% · 38% of their budget
  • DO
    DOOR OF HOPE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $250k · revenue +183%
  • LC
    LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • H
    HILLSDALE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • LW
    Luggage With Love
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
California State University Los Angeles Alumni Association Inc

To foster relationships among alumni, students and community by providing services and activities that build loyalty, support and a lifelong connection to the university.

—
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
6
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
11
Maranatha High School

Maranatha high school is a christ-centered, evangelical college preparatory school that celebrates the whole student by equipping hearts and minds to reflect god's glory through academics, as well as the arts, athletics, and service. we…

Education
12
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa Esperanza Services and the most unlike its peers is Puget Sound Strategic Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Youth CampsAddiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and ShelterPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr11%47%35–55yr13%36%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/59
the rest of the field
15%
12,370/82,255

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
37/51
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LA CANADA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $420,000 · OtherLA CANADA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE UCLA FOUNDATION - JW & IDA M JAMESON FUND — $375,000 · OtherTHE UCLA FOUNDATION - JW & IDA M JAMESON FUNDUniversity of Michigan — $350,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganLA CANADA HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS — $255,000 · OtherLA CANADA HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERSDOOR OF HOPE — $250,000 · OtherDOOR OF HOPELA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $245,000 · OtherLA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONLA CANADA BASEBALLSOFTBALL ASSOCIATION — $240,000 · OtherLA CANADA BASEBALLSOFTBALL ASSOCIATIONRM PYLES BOYS CAMP — $200,000 · OtherTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY — $200,000 · Other+46 more — $1,827,500 · Other+46 moreAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $245,000 · EducationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVER…Pasadena City College Foundation — $225,000 · EducationPasadena City Colleg…INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC — $215,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE STUD…VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES — $155,000 · EducationVILLA ESPERANZA SERV…THE REASON FOUNDATION — $135,000 · EducationTHE REASON FOUNDATIO…GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERS…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · EducationWESTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $45,000 · Education+3 more — $75,000 · Education+3 moreHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $190,000 · HealthHypoparathyroidism Association Inc — $140,000 · HealthTHE GOODEN CENTER — $45,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA — $15,000 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $205,000 · Human ServicesABILITYFIRST — $100,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDES — $40,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $102,500 · Youth DevelopmentA PLACE FOR YOUTH — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCATO INSTITUTE — $90,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute — $80,000 · Public BenefitPUGET SOUND STRATEGIC MINISTRIES — $60,000 · ReligionREASONS TO BELIEVE — $45,000 · ReligionLEAD WITH YOUR LIFE INC — $30,000 · Religion
Other$4,362,500Education$1,225,000Health$400,000Human Services$355,000Youth Development$242,500Public Benefit$170,000Religion$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan — $350,000 over 6y, 38% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE — $250,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetLA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $245,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $245,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLA CANADA BASEBALLSOFTBALL ASSOCIATION — $240,000 over 9y, 25% of budgetPasadena City College Foundation — $225,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC — $215,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $205,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetRM PYLES BOYS CAMP — $200,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY — $200,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $190,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES — $155,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHypoparathyroidism Association Inc — $140,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA POMERANIAN RESCUE INC — $130,000 over 8y, 46% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $115,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAlameda Education Foundation — $110,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $102,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYFIRST — $100,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTROJAN FOOTBALL ALUMNI CLUB — $85,000 over 7y, 45% of budgetPhi Delta Theta Foundation — $85,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLeadership Institute — $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Research Institute For Public Policy — $80,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUGET SOUND STRATEGIC MINISTRIES — $60,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREASONS TO BELIEVE — $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOODEN CENTER — $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAssistance League of Pasadena — $45,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetHILLSIDES — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE — $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LUNCH BUCKET — $35,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetLEAD WITH YOUR LIFE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetA PLACE FOR YOUTH — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetClaremont McKenna College — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUGBY LA — $15,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLuggage With Love — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoothill Family Service — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Police Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetUC ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL INC UNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA ANITA FAMILY SERVICE CO JOANN SANDERSON — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LA CANADA BASEBALLSOFTBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena City College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RM PYLES BOYS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Hypoparathyroidism Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA POMERANIAN RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TROJAN FOOTBALL ALUMNI CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Phi Delta Theta Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Research Institute For Public Policy ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUGET SOUND STRATEGIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds REASONS TO BELIEVE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pasadena Community Fo…California Community …The Patron Saints Fou…The Green FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Pasadena Showcase Hou…Sempra FoundationThe Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…Ann Peppers FoundationGail G Ellis Foundati…
Pasadena Community FoundationCA25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pasadena Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Patron Saints Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Pasadena Showcase House For The Arts · Sempra Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Ann Peppers Foundation · Gail G Ellis Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jw and Ida M Jameson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jw and Ida M Jameson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jw and Ida M Jameson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines