Skip to content
Jungerman Foundation for Justice at a glance

· Private foundation

Jungerman Foundation for Justice

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$825kReligion$565kHuman Services$208kHealth$198kFood & Nutrition$100kCivil Rights$93kSocial Science$46kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $445k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
  • $250k+3 grants · $814k
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pleasant Gap Christian Church$300,000
Nevada R-5 Foundation$264,231
Nevada R-5 School District$250,000
College of the Ozarks$100,000
Childrens Mercy Hosp of KS City$75,000
Kids Across America$50,000
St Paul United Church of Christ$50,000
Missouri School for the Blind$45,000
Missouri School for the Deaf$45,000
Childrens Ctr for Visually Impaird$45,000
Childrens Rights$40,000
Central Institute for the Deaf$35,000
Childrens Haven of SoWest Missouri$30,000
Community Cncl on Performing Arts$30,000
Community Food Pantry of Butler$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $10k → 9%Council on Families in Crisis: $25k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
OH
NE
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$937k · 14 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$937k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+48%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +45%
  • IT
    IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +29%
  • VF
    VITAE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $46k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IF
    INTOUCH FOUNDATION MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $26k
  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • 4P
    4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
Christian Life Resources Inc

The mission of christian life resources is to use life and family issues as bridges to convey the love of god and to share the message of salvation through christ. this organization educates people on what god's word has to say about the…

Religion
11
Missouri Family Policy Council

Religious, charitable, educational and research efforts to advance judeo-christian values in our culture & government that support and strengthen the traditional family.

—
12
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pleasant Gap Christian Church: $343,500 · OtherPleasant Gap Christian ChurchNevada R-5 School District: $250,000 · OtherNevada R-5 School DistrictSALVATION ARMY: $78,250 · OtherSALVATION ARMYChildrens Mercy Hosp of KS City: $75,000 · OtherChildrens Mercy Hosp of KS CitySt Paul United Church of Christ: $50,000 · OtherVITAE FOUNDATION: $46,250 · OtherMissouri School for the Blind: $45,000 · OtherMissouri School for the Deaf: $45,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI: $45,000 · OtherJUDICAL WATCH EDUC FUND: $41,250 · Other+14 more: $180,250 · Other+14 moreNEVADA R-5 SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FOUNDATION: $264,231 · EducationNEVADA R-5 SCHOOL DISTRIC…COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $160,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKSCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $35,000 · EducationCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE…+2 more: $16,000 · EducationIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $70,000 · ReligionKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $50,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFE: $15,000 · ReligionMISSOURI BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $90,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $5,500 · Civil RightsOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF BUTLER: $30,000 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $20,000 · Food & NutritionNAVARRO FARM INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S HOME FOR MOTHERS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON FAMILIES IN CRISIS INC: $25,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $5,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalMIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,199,500Education$475,231Religion$150,000Civil Rights$95,500Food & Nutrition$95,000Human Services$65,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEVADA R-5 SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FOUNDATION: $264,231 over 1y, 53% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $160,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION: $46,250 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI: $45,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF BUTLER: $30,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetST MARY'S HOME FOR MOTHERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FAMILIES IN CRISIS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNAVARRO FARM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charlie & Mary Be…Greater Kansas City C…Community Foundation …Servant FoundationVerizon FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Renaissance Charitabl…The Bank of America C…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…
The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Servant Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jungerman Foundation for Justice funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jungerman Foundation for Justice. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jungerman Foundation for Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home