· Private foundation
Jungerman Foundation for Justice
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k15 grants · $445k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
- $250k+3 grants · $814k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Pleasant Gap Christian Church | $300,000 |
| Nevada R-5 Foundation | $264,231 |
| Nevada R-5 School District | $250,000 |
| College of the Ozarks | $100,000 |
| Childrens Mercy Hosp of KS City | $75,000 |
| St Paul United Church of Christ | $50,000 |
| Kids Across America | $50,000 |
| Childrens Ctr for Visually Impaird | $45,000 |
| Missouri School for the Blind | $45,000 |
| Missouri School for the Deaf | $45,000 |
| Childrens Rights | $40,000 |
| Central Institute for the Deaf | $35,000 |
| Community Food Pantry of Butler | $30,000 |
| Community Cncl on Performing Arts | $30,000 |
| Childrens Haven of SoWest Missouri | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +45%
- ITIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +29%
- VFVITAE FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $46k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- IFINTOUCH FOUNDATION MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · $26k
- EAEVANGEL ASSEMBLY OF GODone grant, 2018 · $10k
- TCThe Children's Mercy Hospitalone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
The mission of christian life resources is to use life and family issues as bridges to convey the love of god and to share the message of salvation through christ. this organization educates people on what god's word has to say about the…
Religious, charitable, educational and research efforts to advance judeo-christian values in our culture & government that support and strengthen the traditional family.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Rights Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEVADA R-5 SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF BUTLER ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FAMILIES IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S HOME FOR MOTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NAVARRO FARM INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Servant Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jungerman Foundation for Justice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.