How much did JULIAN G LANGE FAMILY FOUNDATION 1 grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of JULIAN G LANGE FAMILY FOUNDATION 1’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

fundoperating fundoperatingarmy daytonpennsalvation army

2019

habitat humanitypennsalvation army

2020

habitat humanitychildren'ssalvation armyheritage partners

2021

habitat humanitychildren's

2022

cru militarychildren's bereavementbereavement southsamaritan's purse

2023

cru militarywildlifechildren's

2024

children's bereavementbereavement southcrystalyouth ranchrescue rehabilitationsamaritan's pursehabitat

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k71 grants · $111k
$10k–50k9 grants · $120k
$50k–250k1 grant · $90k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$9.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE ACORN SCHOOL$90,000
DAYTON ART INSTITUTE$20,000
FOODBANK OF DAYTON$15,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF DAYTON$15,000
DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY$15,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$15,000
FIRST LIBERTY$10,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS$10,000
DAYBREAK$6,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
DAYTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCY$5,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.9M · 98 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

98 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%

+19%

Still filing today

35%

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationReligionCivil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +117%
DE
DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY
5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +42%
SP
SAMARITANS PURSE
6× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +134%

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +19%
SV
ST VINCENT DU PAUL
one grant, 2017 · $14k
CB
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER
one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Glasstire

Glasstire is an online magazine for visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture

Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

To be Texas' foremost champion of individual rights & freedoms through education & litigation.

Civil Rights

San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield

To conserve Texas's historical materials and promote the study of Texas history.

Arts & Culture

Baylor Research Institute

Faith based medical research organization bringing innovative treatment to patients through basic science, clinical trials, and health care effectiveness and quality of care research.

Health

Kimbell Art Foundation

Arts & Culture

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

Houston Botanic Garden

Enriching life through discovery, education, and conservation of the natural environment.

Environment

American Civil Liberties Union

To champion individual rights under a charter granted by the ACLU (National Affiliate).

—

The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To provide professional investment management and related services for the funds under management and control of the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System.

Education

Christianity Today International

Equipping Christians to renew their minds, serve the church, and create culture to the glory of God

Religion

Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

DARCC is committed to engaging and educating communities to prevent sexual violence and supporting survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services

Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers-

Faith based hospitals providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to the greater Austin, Texas metropolitan service area and the surrounding communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Great Lakes Center for the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/46

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/43

Grantees still filing

31/43

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,357,000Arts & Culture$252,475Civil Rights$118,000Education$98,550Religion$53,650Human Services$44,550International$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Foundation · The Dayton Power and Light Company · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · King Family Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable · The Jesse and Caryl Philips · Greater Houston Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JULIAN G LANGE FAMILY FOUNDATION 1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALLIANCE FOR CHILDHOOD.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 522327902 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ALLIANCE FOR CHILDHOOD, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1?

Find your warmest path to Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JULIAN G LANGE FAMILY FOUNDATION 1

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1?

More from the funding graph

JULIAN G LANGE FAMILY FOUNDATION 1

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1?

More from the funding graph