Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$322k
Granted FY2024still arriving
84
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$468kHuman Services$344kArts & Culture$265kCivil Rights$187kFood & Nutrition$127kHealth$89kEnvironment$86kInternational$59kOther$0
02FY2024 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k74 grants · $112k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$1,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ACORN SCHOOL$90,000
DAYTON ART INSTITUTE$20,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF DAYTON$15,000
DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY$15,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$15,000
FOODBANK OF DAYTON$15,000
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS$10,000
FIRST LIBERTY$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$10,000
DAYBREAK$6,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS$5,000
WILDLIFE RESCUE & REHABILITATION$5,000
DAYTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREBORN: $1k → 16%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $1k → 10%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $1k → 10%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $500 → 10%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $500 → 10%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $300 → 10%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $250 → 10%DAYBREAK: $6k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%DAYBREAK: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $4k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 94 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

94 repeat relationships: 63 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
16

Total granted

$1.9M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+22%

Still filing today

52%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +134%
  • DE
    DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +11%
  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Dayton
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DU PAUL
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
4
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
5
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
6
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
10
American Theological Library Association

The mission of atla is to foster the study of theology and religion by enhancing the development of theological and religious studies libraries and librarianship.

—
11
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas; the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
43/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ACORN SCHOOL: $266,500 · OtherTHE ACORN SCHOOLFOODBANK OF DAYTON: $116,000 · OtherFOODBANK OF DAYTONIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $101,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYST VINCENT DE PAUL: $42,000 · Other+86 more: $530,750 · Other+86 moreTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $210,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DAYTON ART …Witte Museum: $29,000 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum+5 more: $19,475 · Arts & Culture+5 moreALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $96,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE D…FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $69,000 · Civil RightsFIRST LIBE…TEXAS VALUES: $21,000 · Civil RightsTEXAS VALU…+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesST VINCEN…CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $49,100 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS…DAYBREAK INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesDAYBREAK …+3 more: $6,850 · Human ServicesDAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY INC: $75,000 · EducationUniversity of Dayton: $15,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $8,000 · EducationALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Education+4 more: $7,050 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $41,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $8,000 · ReligionMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $2,400 · ReligionCrossway International Inc: $2,250 · ReligionLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $13,000 · EnvironmentSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $4,400 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $1,700 · Environment
Other$1,161,250Arts & Culture$258,475Civil Rights$187,000Human Services$156,950Education$110,550Religion$53,650Environment$19,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $210,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $96,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $69,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $49,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDAYBREAK INC: $41,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $41,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWitte Museum: $29,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS VALUES: $21,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC RIDING INSTITUTE INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $10,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DAYTON INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSan Antonio Rescue Mission: $8,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDOSS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetH E BUTT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOS COMPADRES DE SAN ANTONIO: $4,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY: $3,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO INC: $3,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $2,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCrossway International Inc: $2,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON HISTORY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLaity Renewal Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Antonio Busy Bodies Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS VALUES ↗
  • Who funds THERAPEUTIC RIDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DAYTON INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Rescue Mission ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX30.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Dayton Foundation · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Ksl Family Foundation · James & Susan Martin Charitable Tr Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1?

    Find your warmest path to Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julian G Lange Family Foundation 1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph